To: MNJohnnie
The company at hand, Dubai Ports World, is owned by the United Arab Emirates, so not only would we be handing over operations of our ports I see the Port Deal Hysterics in the pay of the Democrat Party sill WILL NOT report the truth.
What was not true?
10 posted on
03/08/2006 8:22:04 AM PST by
eskimo
(Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
To: eskimo
Let me know if you ever get an answer to that question. Not insults as usual, but an answer.
14 posted on
03/08/2006 8:51:47 AM PST by
WatchingInAmazement
("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
To: eskimo
I'll bite....we are NOT "handing over operation of our ports." There are TERMINALS (landing places for barges/ships) which will have individuals (Americans, union members) working there who will now get a paycheck from a Dubai Company instead of a British Company.
17 posted on
03/08/2006 9:03:50 AM PST by
goodnesswins
( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
To: eskimo; WatchingInAmazement
You mean other than "handing over operations of our ports", "45-day investigation normally required", "President Bush's claim that he knew nothing about the deal until after it had been approved, which wasn't terribly reassuring", "21 ports that are at stake, which would give the United Arab Emirates control over almost every major shipping terminal on the Eastern Seaboard"?
Read more at sfgate.com
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson