Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yet more evidence of conservative disillusionment with the GOP thanks to Bush. We need a Regean conservative in '08 or we're in serious trouble.
1 posted on 03/08/2006 7:08:16 AM PST by beeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: beeler

"It might also have had something to do with speaker No. 2, conservative blogger Andrew Sullivan. Author of the forthcoming "The Conservative Soul: How We Lost It; How to Get It Back," Sullivan called Bush "reckless" and "a socialist," and accused him of betraying "almost every principle conservatism has ever stood for.""

This character recommended on his blog that people vote for Kerry in the 2004 elections. He was unhappy about Bush's stance on homosexual marriage. Now, he wants us to believe that he is a "true conservative," eh?


187 posted on 03/08/2006 1:34:08 PM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beeler

Right.

I wouldn't call Bush a socialist. He's more of an internationalist.

When the Repubs nominated Bush for the first go-around, he was on shaky ground with the conservative wing, considering his pusillanimous father's record. He gave a good show in his first term as he needed us. Aside from Alito ( which was half-hearted and only under duress) and Roberts who was really good, he only gave the figurative finger.

We got stick with Gonzales, more invaders, a bogus border policy, a bogus "guest worker" plan, allowing Muslims to continue to infiltrate America, and even allowing our prots to be run by them.


188 posted on 03/08/2006 1:39:19 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beeler
Yet more evidence of conservative disillusionment with the GOP thanks to Bush. We need a Reagan conservative in '08 or we're in serious trouble.

Okay, but Bush was supposed to be the Reaganite alternative in 2000. Certainly in contrast to McCain. Forbes and Keyes might have been more Reaganite, but they never stood a chance to win.

Once a politician is in the Washington loop, he's already a part of the system and not likely to challenge it. Governors are a safer bet for President than Senators: not only do they have proven administrative skills, they're also apt to be more independent.

Bush came to politics and the presidency a strange combination of outsider and insider. He was an outsider because he'd spent most of his life outside Washington and outside politics. That would have been a good thing. But his family connections made him an insider and he inherited some of his opinions from his father's advisors.

For 2008, a real outsider would be a good thing, but those are hard to find. Beware of Washingtonians who've cultivated the outsider pose without being really independent and beware of "outsiders" who get their ideas from the old gang of "insiders."

189 posted on 03/08/2006 1:47:57 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beeler

The Cato Institute are clearly DU Trolls.


190 posted on 03/08/2006 2:00:54 PM PST by madconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beeler

Marking.


195 posted on 03/08/2006 3:22:08 PM PST by TAdams8591 (Small is the key!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: beeler

Don't forget The "Gold Card" For Illegal Aliens.


196 posted on 03/08/2006 3:55:22 PM PST by VU4G10 (Have You Forgotten?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson