[SoothingDave]

Every person that is killed by a driver that has been drinking could be avoided by people not driving when they drink. That is absolutely a true statement. For if noone was drinking and driving there would be noone killed or hurt by a driver that had been drinking.

You've finally outed yourself. Congratulations.

The question is whether it makes sense to target minimally intoxicated drivers when statistics make it clear that it is those with much larger BACs who are the problem.

If you want zero to be the legal limit, then just admit it. Don't pretend that "science" makes 0.08 a rational limit and then come around in 5 years and claim "science" means it must be 0.05.

SD

[BlueStateDepression]

I have nothing to out bcause I hide nothing sir.

Minimally intoxicated drivers????? .08 is the limit. Deal with it.

I have never said I want zero limit, I have said on this thread and many others that I support .08.

What would you use to justify the limit you would set?
"science" is out right?