1 posted on
03/08/2006 3:46:56 AM PST by
bd476
To: bd476
If they have a president, a constitution, a foreign minister, and so on, for EU, then they should have only one seat on international organizations as well...
2 posted on
03/08/2006 3:58:01 AM PST by
paudio
![](http://i2.tinypic.com/qz3xi0.jpg)
President of the Republic of Poland
Lech Kaczynski
Photo courtesy of website of President of the Republic of Poland
3 posted on
03/08/2006 4:04:50 AM PST by
bd476
To: bd476
A foreign minister was in the rejected constitution - I suppose the anti-American Solana figures he does not need to consent of the people to get what he wants.
4 posted on
03/08/2006 4:07:11 AM PST by
Colosis
(Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængruppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK) IRA = Ragheads)
Javier Solano
7 posted on
03/08/2006 4:24:59 AM PST by
bd476
To: bd476
If the EU gets a seat at the UN and an Ambassador , does that mean that all of the countries belonging to the EU will be represented by the Eu and their Ambassadors and seats will become vacant?
Why should the foreign powers in Europe already seated and represented, be given another seat becasue they have banded together?
What difference does it make anyway as the UN is useless as teats on a boar hog.
To: Lukasz; lizol; Grzegorz 246
10 posted on
03/08/2006 5:23:16 AM PST by
bd476
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson