[Oasis26]

Liberal here.

This is too funny. The NYT has a story expected to roll tomorrow, yet Right-leaning Drudge and a freeper report it first this evening, and everyone is ready to indict the Times for treason.

More than likely the story will in fact appear in tomorrow's edition; there's absolutely no reason to report on it before that time, however. In the rush to crucify a liberal newspaper, some conservatives have demonstrated the same lapse in judgement that could possibly diminish this nation's ability to effectively combat terrorism worldwide.

Oasis

[FreeReign]

...Right-leaning Drudge...

I think he goes both ways.

[mylife]

Blow it out yer ear Lib

Drudge is just a yellow journalist too

[Admin Moderator]

Your oasis has dried up.

[mylife]

Oh those liberals are a bastion of steadfastness

[binkdeville]

Wrong buddy ..Times has an agenda and you know it ..they would get us all killed in the obsession of making Bush look bad.

[nopardons]

It's already up on the TIMES' own web site. Where do you think Drudge got it?

And slamming FR, makes you look like a troll. *sniff, sniff*

[thoughtomator]

Nobody here would have mentioned it if it weren't about to hit the pages of a major newspaper (which it now already has). The NY Times wasn't going to not publish it based on this heads up about their intentions.

[p23185]

This is too funny. The NYT has a story expected to roll tomorrow, yet Right-leaning Drudge and a freeper report it first this evening, and everyone is ready to indict the Times for treason.

Don't you think the story has already been printed and is off the presses? It more than likely is already into the distribution channel for tomorrow am.