[stockstrader]

True, that his silence is not proof that he used steroids. So, according to you, public figures JUST LET defamation go because it is not easy to win? They will not respond if their name is dragged through the mud? They won't respond legally if their legacy is attacked? They won't respond to 'character assassination'? They won't attempt to clear their name against false charges that partially destroy their lifes accomplishments?

If they charges against them are false, I hardly think they would just 'look the other way'. In fact, with his financial ability to fight slander or libel, I would think he would JUMP at the chance to prove that the allegations are totally bogus. With his financial security already established, I would think that his reputation is much more important to him than money.

[Publius Valerius]

Perhaps, and I think you raise a good point. But it's worth noting that newspapers (or magazines) almost--not totally, but almost--have full legal immunity for whatever they write--and that could be driving Bonds's choice not to sue.