To: Hill of Tara
On a previous evolution thread, I compiled a few challenges to evolution. What's wrong with using them again, especially when my post was directed not to you, busybody, but to another poster whom I had never shared those points with before.
I believe that the objection is over providing information to which an extensive rebuttal has been written, in spite of the fact that you never provided a response to the rebuttal.
261 posted on
03/07/2006 6:19:25 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
sorry about that, I meant to provide a response, I must have forgotten to.
264 posted on
03/07/2006 6:20:19 PM PST by
Hill of Tara
("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.")
To: Dimensio
Most scientists don't care one way or the other about Darwinian evolution; it's of more interest to sociologists. Somebody could take a poll of historians, psychologists and political scientists, but that is not how science is done. Repeal the law of evolution, it won't make the slightest difference, but it would possibly please those who also don't like algebra.
266 posted on
03/07/2006 6:23:43 PM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson