Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hill of Tara
On a previous evolution thread, I compiled a few challenges to evolution. What's wrong with using them again, especially when my post was directed not to you, busybody, but to another poster whom I had never shared those points with before.

I believe that the objection is over providing information to which an extensive rebuttal has been written, in spite of the fact that you never provided a response to the rebuttal.
261 posted on 03/07/2006 6:19:25 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio

sorry about that, I meant to provide a response, I must have forgotten to.


264 posted on 03/07/2006 6:20:19 PM PST by Hill of Tara ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

To: Dimensio

Most scientists don't care one way or the other about Darwinian evolution; it's of more interest to sociologists. Somebody could take a poll of historians, psychologists and political scientists, but that is not how science is done. Repeal the law of evolution, it won't make the slightest difference, but it would possibly please those who also don't like algebra.


266 posted on 03/07/2006 6:23:43 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson