Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruth Bader Snoozeburg
WND.com ^ | 03-07-06 | Farah, Joseph

Posted on 03/07/2006 10:03:09 AM PST by Theodore R.

Ruth Bader Snoozeburg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: March 7, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Actual artist rendition of Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg asleep during hearing

Most Americans didn't see this picture.

I'm quite sure they would have if the Supreme Court justice asleep at the switch were Clarence Thomas or Antonin Scalia.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

But it was Ruth Bader Snoozeburg catching 40 winks during a Supreme Court hearing last week. And she is a darling of the U.S. media.

Why?

Let me count the ways this extremist pleases my colleagues. She is on record as a supporter of:

"Prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions."

A statutory restriction on political rights of bigamists "is of questionable constitutionality since it appears to encroach impermissibly upon private relationships."

"Sex-segregated adult or juvenile institutions are obviously separate and in a variety of ways, unequal ... If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected."

"The Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts, while ostensibly providing 'separate but equal' benefits to both sexes, perpetuate stereotyped sex roles to the extent that they carry out congressionally-mandated purposes."

"Replacing 'Mother's Day' and 'Father's Day' with a 'Parents' Day' should be considered, as an observance more consistent with a policy of minimizing traditional sex-based differences in parental roles."

Lowering the age of consent for purposes of statutory rape from 16 to 12.

And these are positions she held publicly before her nomination and confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court.

During her tenure she has ruled with the majority to:

strike down all sodomy laws in the U.S.;

permit local governments to seize private property for no other reason than raising tax revenue;

approve race-based preferences in hiring and student admissions;

approve the biggest attack on the First Amendment in my lifetime – the so-called "campaign finance reforms" that limit political speech before elections;

I could go on and on. You either get it by now or you don't. This woman cares nothing about the Constitution, our nation's rich heritage of limited government, the rule of law, the will of the people, the notion of self-government or, frankly, freedom.

She's an elitist – a former political director for the American Civil Liberties Union. She's one of those creatures I just can't stand – the kind who believes she and her law-school buddies know better how to run your life than you do.

And that's why you probably never saw this picture until today. It shows Ruth Bader Snoozeburg, as she should be known henceforth, asleep during oral arguments about political redistricting in Texas.

Credit Associated Press newswoman Gina Holland for noting the incident in her story: "The subject matter was extremely technical and near the end of the argument Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dozed in her chair. Justices David Souter and Samuel Alito, who flank the 72-year-old, looked at her but did not give her a nudge."

One account had her out like a light for a solid 15 minutes.

Frankly, America is safest from judicial tyranny when Snoozeburg is unconscious. Unfortunately, she is not likely to miss rulings to narcoleptic attacks, just the arguments considered so vital to the decisions these high priests in black robes hand down.

But remember this drawing the next time you hear Snoozeburg tell you about how important is "the process" that she and her colleagues use to make their rulings from on high.

It was a mistake to confirm this extremist to the highest court in the land. It is a bigger mistake to pretend this 72-year-old is faithfully exercising her duties.

Time for her to retire – so she can take as many midday naps as she likes.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: alito; baderginsburg; ginsburg; hersnooziness; judgesominex; liberalism; roberts; sleepingonjob; snoozeburg; supremecourt; thomas; txredistricting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
If any of the four conservative justices had done this, the act would have been as well known as the ill-fated shooting of Harry Whittington. Remember too that one Orrin G. Hatch cosponsored her nomination in 1993. Thanks a lot, UT.
1 posted on 03/07/2006 10:03:12 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Please let her snooze.


2 posted on 03/07/2006 10:04:45 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

I was amazed when I read her bigoted statements regarding religion. So much venom and hatred.


3 posted on 03/07/2006 10:05:30 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Actual artist rendition of Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg asleep during hearing

Is this article saying there is one, or that there would have been one had Scalia or Thomas been sleeping?

4 posted on 03/07/2006 10:06:24 AM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

All photoshop glories to martin_fierro.

As usual.

5 posted on 03/07/2006 10:07:19 AM PST by SquirrelKing (Contrary to popular belief, America is not a democracy, it is a Chucktatorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg.....just before dozing off.
6 posted on 03/07/2006 10:08:05 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

That's funny, but it's a fake story.


7 posted on 03/07/2006 10:09:06 AM PST by Bingo Jerry (Bing-freaking-go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Might as well snooze, her mind was made up before she heard a word anyway.


8 posted on 03/07/2006 10:11:34 AM PST by OldFriend (HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bingo Jerry

really?


9 posted on 03/07/2006 10:12:09 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Justice Alito didn't cast a vote in a recent case-don't remember which-because he didn't "hear" the arguments. If Ruth snoozes through a case, or 15 minutes worth of it, shouldn't she have to recuse herself?


10 posted on 03/07/2006 10:13:50 AM PST by syncked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Bingo Jerry

?


12 posted on 03/07/2006 10:14:29 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"If any of the four conservative justices had done this, the act would have been as well known as the ill-fated shooting of Harry Whittington"

Your point is well taken. However there is no such photo. Justice Ginzburg has some strange ideas about American Society. Let's not resort to the kind of story telling our leftist Citizens are famous for and start rumors like this one. At least she had the good sense to vote with the Right side regarding freedom of expression with respect to the Military recruiters on Campus.
13 posted on 03/07/2006 10:15:12 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bingo Jerry

Why is it a fake story?


14 posted on 03/07/2006 10:16:55 AM PST by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing

She should be forced into retirement if this ever happens again


I would be happy for it to happen just for this time


15 posted on 03/07/2006 10:17:17 AM PST by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing

...ZZZzzzzZZzzzZZzZZz...

*huhwha?*


16 posted on 03/07/2006 10:18:43 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: half-cajun

You're not seriously expecting an answer from our little troll-friend, are you?

;-)


17 posted on 03/07/2006 10:18:46 AM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Woops, my bad. It's real. I had it mixed up with something else.


18 posted on 03/07/2006 10:19:35 AM PST by Bingo Jerry (Bing-freaking-go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

LOL


19 posted on 03/07/2006 10:20:29 AM PST by SquirrelKing (Contrary to popular belief, America is not a democracy, it is a Chucktatorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Ruth BuZzzzzzzzzzzy Ginsberg


20 posted on 03/07/2006 10:20:46 AM PST by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson