Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Conservatives Prepare Austere Alternative Budget
New York Times ^ | March 7, 2006 | CARL HULSE

Posted on 03/07/2006 1:20:10 AM PST by RWR8189

WASHINGTON, March 6 — With Congress heading into a politically perilous budget season, influential House conservatives plan this week to propose an austere alternative spending plan that would pare more than $650 billion over five years, balance the budget and drastically shrink three cabinet agencies.

The legislation, part of a push by some Republicans to re-establish themselves as champions of fiscal restraint, was taking shape as President Bush struck a similar theme on Monday by asking Congress to grant him line-item veto power to eliminate federal spending that he might judge wasteful.

"We can't be all things to all people when it comes to spending the taxpayers' money," Mr. Bush said at a ceremony installing a new chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

But House conservative leaders would go far beyond the president's own budget proposal, illustrating the difficulty the White House and the Republican leadership have had in persuading the caucus to speak with one voice on the matter.

Senior aides say the conservatives' plan would wring about $350 billion from Medicare, Medicaid and other social programs and save $300 billion partly through a major reorganization of the Education, Commerce and Energy Departments.

"We are putting our money where our mouth is," said one of the officials, who would discuss the proposal only without being identified because it was still being prepared for release Wednesday by leaders of the Republican Study Committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alternativebudget; budget; budgetprocess; fy2007; mikepence; pence; rsc; studycommittee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Pence and all the members are the RSC are still out there fighting the good fight.
1 posted on 03/07/2006 1:20:16 AM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I for one am ready to fight the good fight. And am glad to see there's still a spine in our party. No backing down, it's time to cowboy up. Right On Pence!


2 posted on 03/07/2006 1:23:24 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Beware the Democratic party has been over run by CRAB PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This is the kind of thing we can campaign with. We will keep your taxes low, not only slow government down but shrink it, save future generations from higher taxes and debt, and not just cut our deficit but balance the budget without new taxes. It's going to be hard with our past track record but the democrats will only have there tried and failed tax and spend plans and the voters have seen through them time and time again.

It's Not To Late, Lets hope all republicans in congress rally behind this budget. If not we need to insist and insist till they beg us to leave them alone.


3 posted on 03/07/2006 1:29:11 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Beware the Democratic party has been over run by CRAB PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Good post, and good news.


4 posted on 03/07/2006 1:38:56 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

If passed it would be the first bill bush vetos, maybe two if he vetos the Port deal bill.


5 posted on 03/07/2006 1:39:38 AM PST by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369

Thanks for raining on my parade :(

Though sadly, your likely to be right. I hope not.


6 posted on 03/07/2006 1:41:11 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Beware the Democratic party has been over run by CRAB PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Austere? When the new budget for an agency does not have a baseline of last year's budget plus inflation, I'll start considering austere as a possible adjective.


7 posted on 03/07/2006 1:44:01 AM PST by Dahoser (Time to condense the spending nonsense: Terry Tate for OMB head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
How about dumping the free drug program, or going back on rebuilding that gold mosque that was blown up?

How about making Iraq pay us back for some of the money we blew over there?

How about cutting back on all the aids money going to Africa? How much money does it cost to tell them about monogamy in marriage?

How much pork was in the last transportation bill?

Are these people really serious or are they just campaigning?
8 posted on 03/07/2006 1:53:45 AM PST by liliesgrandpa (The Republican Party simply can't do anything without that critical 100-seat Senate majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
We will keep your taxes low, not only slow government down but shrink it, save future generations from higher taxes and debt, and not just cut our deficit but balance the budget without new taxes.

Except this plan does none of that. Government continues to grow and the budget will not be balanced. And absent any specifics it's hard to look at this as anything other than a political stunt.

9 posted on 03/07/2006 2:01:17 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Except this plan does none of that. Government continues to grow and the budget will not be balanced. And absent any specifics it's hard to look at this as anything other than a political stunt.

It's at least lip service, more than we've been seeing for the congressional leadership for the last few years. If it goes beyond that lip service, great, but at least it is on the table.
10 posted on 03/07/2006 2:07:52 AM PST by kingu (Liberalism: The art of sticking your fingers in your ears and going NANANANA..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
My thoughts exactly. Every time it gets close to an election them there congress critters try to make it look like they're doing their jobs, politics as usual no matter which party controls congress. Teddy Roosevelt had it right when he said that there wasn't a lick of difference between the Democrat and the Republican parties.
11 posted on 03/07/2006 2:13:03 AM PST by Vote 4 Nixon (EAT...FISH...SLEEP...REDUX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

A cut of $650 billion over 5 years or $130 billion a year would equal a net cut in spending. Not to mention the downsizing of three agencies.

Anyways, it's the best thing I have seen come from someone in congress in years. It's better then the dribs and drabs and half measures they have been putting out.


12 posted on 03/07/2006 2:16:50 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Beware the Democratic party has been over run by CRAB PEOPLE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
influential House conservatives plan this week to propose an austere alternative spending plan that would pare more than $650 billion over five years, balance the budget and drastically shrink three cabinet agencies

1. Talk is cheap.

2. Influential house conservatives should have been doing this years ago, not months before an election.

3. $650 billion does NOT balance the budget over 5 years

4. While this is a good idea, if falls well short of what is necessary

13 posted on 03/07/2006 2:19:04 AM PST by WhiteGuy ("Every Generation needs a new revolution" - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86

The last time spending growth was held to those levels was under the Clinton administration. The current government adds almost as much off budget to spending than will be saved with these supposed cuts, and these cuts will not eliminate the deficit. It's great to say you'll cut the budget but the devil is in the details. I'll wait until I see them.


14 posted on 03/07/2006 2:24:18 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy

The RSC is always working behind the scenes to further conservative goals within the Republican caucus, not just when the NY Times decides to do a write-up.


15 posted on 03/07/2006 2:45:46 AM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
This has no chance, look at what happended to Gingrich even when he had the support of his party to shut down government. Clinton and the libs made mincemeat of him.

I am for waiting until 'Atlas shrugs' with a return to feudalism, moats, drawbridges, chivalry the whole enchilada. GGG guns groceries gold.


BUMP

16 posted on 03/07/2006 2:54:20 AM PST by capitalist229 (Keep Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capitalist229

Oh my, everyone is negative this morning. If there is no way to please you, why would anyone even try?


17 posted on 03/07/2006 3:23:58 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

[The legislation, part of a push by some Republicans to re-establish themselves as champions of fiscal restraint, was taking shape as President Bush struck a similar theme on Monday by asking Congress to grant him line-item veto power to eliminate federal spending that he might judge wasteful.]

Campaign bs for those who are facing re-election. Always been a conservative but now I realize that both parties are worthless liars and thieves. And pubs wonder why the ratings of Congress and the president are in the 30% range. The problem with them is they don't realize that the true conservative right is smarter than than the libs and neo cons and won't vote for liars and fools and liberal pubs or communist dems at the voting booths.


18 posted on 03/07/2006 3:24:44 AM PST by ohhhh ( I pray the public school system collapses for the good of the children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Cheap political trick in an election year. The Republican Party no longer stands for anything in this bill.


19 posted on 03/07/2006 3:30:33 AM PST by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupjob

Go find out about Pence and the RSC.

Just because the media doesn't keep a journal of their everyday affairs doesn't mean they aren't working to advance conservative goals.


20 posted on 03/07/2006 3:33:24 AM PST by RWR8189 (George Allen for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson