Oh thank you for the Hudson River art - it does, indeed, dilute the cotton candy taste
My taste in art is all over the place, no connoisseur, I. However, the second painting of the waterfall is the kind of art I like--because it reminds me of a favorite place I like to visit, Hamilton Pool, in Austin, TX.
Maybe that's another aspect of art that appeals to audiences or buyers - some connection to a pleasant memory in the mind's eye of the beholder. Whether it's "good" or "bad" doesn't matter that much.
FWIW, I don't like TK's stuff, and I *really* don't like Precious Moments, either. I tend to buy SW art and photography--at least, I used to when I had some discretionary income. It came after music, though.
Thanks for posting those pix.
I would recommend, also, Maxfield Parrish's landscapes. They are nice on the computer, but if you can see one in person, it's like the canvas is glowing. I would love to own one. (there is one @ the Phoenix art museum that I have to see every time we're there!)
>> Here's a couple of REAL "painters of light" - Albert Bierstadt and Thomas Cole - to take the taste out of our mouths . . <<
Wow. you sure know how to settle an argument!
Exactly- these are fine examples of light in painting..
Kincaid is to art what Yanni (speaking of people in trouble today!) is to music. Commercial and too cute by half.