Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elkfersupper
Not exactly. We used to have public roads that belonged to the public. Now they belong to the government.

If they "belong to the public," they belong to the government. If they do not belong to the government, then they are owned by a private entity. Said entity may consist of one or more individuals.

74 posted on 03/07/2006 7:02:31 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
If they "belong to the public," they belong to the government.

Nope, the government separated itself from the public interest quite awhile back.

Used to be, the public owned the roads and the government maintained them.

Now, the government owns the roads.

Otherwise, how does one explain the content of this news article?

You think the public wants all these surcharges for silly nanny-state traffic violations?

The only way the governments get away with it is incrementalism and picking us off one at a time.

75 posted on 03/07/2006 7:13:25 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson