To: RFEngineer
Oh no. He was a draftsman/ then engineer later.
Did you know the B70 was only tested to 80% of its potential?
I still think it would have been an effective platform for several years. In a couple of years it would have had SRAM(ancestor) capability to clear the way, and (Y)F-12/F108 escort.
I am looking for an image of the Valkyrie in flight. In this image you can clearly see the intensity of the wing vortex that got the F104.
However I think a different airplane from the F104 might not have been sucked in the way it did. The F104 was a lightweight aircraft with the T tail. Had one of the other aircraft been there, say the F4(much heavier etc), as it pitched up it would have vectored up and backwards and away I think.
Wolf
86 posted on
03/06/2006 7:44:56 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf
I am looking for an image of the Valkyrie in flight. In this image you can clearly see the intensity of the wing vortex that got the F104.
However I think a different airplane from the F104 might not have been sucked in the way it did. The F104 was a lightweight aircraft with the T tail. Had one of the other aircraft been there, say the F4(much heavier etc), as it pitched up it would have vectored up and backwards and away I think.
Here you go with the image. Do you agree with my guess/somewhat?
Wolf
90 posted on
03/06/2006 7:56:04 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: RFEngineer
91 posted on
03/06/2006 7:57:28 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf
"I am looking for an image of the Valkyrie in flight. In this image you can clearly see the intensity of the wing vortex that got the F104.
"
I thought it was a B-58 that knocked off one of the veritcal stabilizers, resulting in the crash, not a 104...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson