Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Lucky
you don't know what you're talking about

Dang! -- I'd wish you'd have told me that before I posted my comment and made myself look foolish.   Aw well, at least I'm lucky enough to run into a smart guy like you who can bring me up to speed..  Let's see  --this is what I've got:

1.   .  Ethanol subsidy is reported at somewhere between $50 million and $100 million per year depending on who you believe.
2. This years increase in the federal budget request for the Marines had to be limited to just $800 million.   The additional funding made funding available for "a new Marine Corps Special Operations component to conduct special reconnaissance and other missions; establishes a SOF Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Squadron".   This will save the lives of many Marines.
3. If the budget for this component had been increased by ten percent then fewer marines would have died.
4. Instead, the money has to go to farmers to make fuel that I nobody wants to buy unless the IRS forces them to.

What am I missing?

231 posted on 03/07/2006 8:17:08 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: expat_panama

You're missing that there is no federal subsidy to farmers involving ethanol. In fact, the market for ethanol actually reduces subsidies to farmers (or in many cases landowners who don't farm). Farm subsidies tend to take the form of price supports; anything which raises the price of corn reduces the support payments.


241 posted on 03/07/2006 10:50:27 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson