Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justinellis329

Maybe...

The other detriment to having pilots is the artificial performace limits that would need to be set in order to avoid hazardous G-forces.


12 posted on 03/06/2006 8:56:06 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SteveMcKing
The other detriment to having pilots is the artificial performace limits that would need to be set in order to avoid hazardous G-forces.

What do you have against humans in space?

Granted, for a military mission they're not necessary. But the cool thing about this is that we apparently have a method of getting humans in space that could probably be flown every day or two. Amortize the costs of getting into space when you can re-fly the same vehicle with just a fuel top-off every day or two and you see that this kind of thing would be extreemly useful.

Probably needs to be a tad larger to haul at least some cargo, but other than that I think this is the way to get humans into space, not Apollo V2.0. Let the big dumb rockets haul unmanned missions and this kind of stuff for crew transfer.

14 posted on 03/06/2006 9:03:01 AM PST by narby (Evolution is the new "third rail" in American politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson