To: dennisw
I"ve got five bucks that says the source for the NYT article on the 'wiretapping' was Rockefeller. Any takers?
L
8 posted on
03/05/2006 8:59:12 PM PST by
Lurker
(Cuz I got one hand in my pocket and the other one is slapping a hippy.)
To: Lurker
I'm not averse to a wager now and then but I don't throw money away. :)
10 posted on
03/05/2006 9:14:42 PM PST by
jazusamo
(:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
To: Lurker; bybybill
I"ve got five bucks that says the source for the NYT article on the 'wiretapping' was Rockefeller. Any takers?
I would give Rockefeller his staff 70% odds of being the leakers but we have so many other Democrat traitors that it's not a lock by any means. By Democrat traitors think of their Senate staffers who trade in rumors and access to compromised computers. Senators won't get their hands dirty, won't do the dirty deed directly. Their staffers will because the Senator verbally requests them to (nothing written down of course) or the Senate staffer does it under his own initiative to give everyone plausible deniability. He's a righteous crusader type.
44 posted on
03/06/2006 5:38:15 AM PST by
dennisw
(Muslim's biggest enemy is the founder of Islam, Muhammad. Muslims are victims of this conman-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson