Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Admits To 'Deep-Seated Conflicts' Amid Economic Boom
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 3-6-2006 | Richard Spencer

Posted on 03/05/2006 5:32:18 PM PST by blam

China admits to 'deep-seated conflicts' amid economic boom

By Richard Spencer in Beijing
(Filed: 06/03/2006)

China's prime minister gave a surprisingly gloomy assessment of the state of the country's booming economy and fast-changing society in his annual speech to parliament yesterday.

In the face of near-euphoria among governments and businesses in the western world about the pace of its growth, Wen Jiabao said long-term economic health was at risk while society faced "deep-seated conflicts".

Wen Jiabao delivers the annual ‘work report’ yesterday

For years, Communist leaders have worried about the growing wealth gap between the expanding cities of the east coast and the rural interior. But yesterday Mr Wen, delivering the annual "work report" to the rubber-stamp National People's Congress, added the need to be concerned about "social equity".

This was a strong nod to concern that inequalities are not just caused by different rates of economic growth but by such issues as corruption and illegal expropriation of land by officials. "Some deeply-seated conflicts that have accumulated over a long time have yet to be fundamentally resolved, and new problems have arisen that cannot be ignored," he said.

Mr Wen is already seeking to address some of these issues with a policy of building a "new socialist countryside" - a plan to spend £25 billion on improving incomes in rural areas and providing better education and health care.

But Mr Wen also addressed fundamental economic issues caused by the speed of economic growth, which most outsiders regard with wonder rather than concern.

China's entry into the World Trade Organisation in 2001 was a nervous time for international businesses and China's banks, which feared whether the country's export-led economic miracle would survive the strict, pro-competition rules it would have to face.

In fact, the reverse was the case, with growth from 2002-04 that surpassed predictions. But Mr Wen alluded to fears that the growth was unsustainable. Much of the investment has gone on factories and power stations, which is starting to lead to over-supply.

That is one reason for the threat of trade wars - as in last summer's "Bra Wars" with Europe - as companies cut prices to stay competitive. Many now risk bankruptcy as a result.

"Production gluts are increasingly severe, prices of related goods are falling and inventories are rising," he said. "Profits are shrinking, losses are growing and latent financial risks are increasing." If companies start defaulting on debts it could trigger a crisis in the banking system, which has given out huge loans to fuel the investment.

Mr Wen is under pressure on several fronts. He needs to bring excessive growth under control, but keep it high enough to employ China's vast pool of surplus labour to avoid social unrest.

For President Hu Jintao, the answer to corruption has been to intensify a campaign to revive the teaching of Marxist theory to party cadres. There has also been a shift away from economic reforms such as the privatisation of state-owned industries.

But while diplomats and China's growing activist movement have welcomed the shift towards spending on the countryside, many say that without changes in the party's autocratic management system it will have little effect.

"I used to be an optimist about (Hu and Wen's) reformist tendencies," said one western diplomat. "But I think it's become clear that what we have here is a return to old ways of thinking."

Mr Wen yesterday set a target of eight per cent for growth this year. This is lower than most economists predict, suggesting that he fears that the higher growth is now, the harder it can fall.

The answer for many economists and Mr Wen himself is to boost the domestic economy - leading to an unusual call for the once strictly puritan Communist population to go out and spend.

But he accepted that this depended on improving health care and pensions, the lack of which drives the determination to earn and save.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: admits; amid; boom; china; conflicts; deep; economic; seated

1 posted on 03/05/2006 5:32:20 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

Karl Roves fault.


2 posted on 03/05/2006 5:39:56 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Can the Communist Party in China survive if China continues to Boom?

No way.

3 posted on 03/05/2006 5:44:06 PM PST by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

bump!


4 posted on 03/05/2006 5:47:43 PM PST by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

China will have its ups and downs on the way UP...as it struggles to balance resource, supply and capacity...

Make no mistake though...China is the elephant in the produce aisle..

Usually when China Farts like this...the markets go all whacky worldwide...

Commodities drop, currencys and debt derivitives wiggle as they digest the news...

Jim Rogers' book on commodities goes into detail on the effect China will have on the global markets over the next decade..

Excellent read...


5 posted on 03/05/2006 5:52:47 PM PST by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH - PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Cats are out of the bag, and it will be damned hard to correct by closing barn doors after the live stock are spread out over the landscape.


6 posted on 03/05/2006 5:55:13 PM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
[17:50] p:|*HONG KONG'S HANG SENG MARCH CONTRACT OPENS AT 15,774

[17:53] p: | 20:53ET DJ MARKET TALK: Mar HSI Futures +0.2%; Positive Bias »

7 posted on 03/05/2006 5:58:11 PM PST by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH - PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
"Can the Communist Party in China survive if China continues to Boom?
No way."

I think you are exactly right. But I also think the Communist Party in China is not nearly as committed to Communist ideology as it used to be. Funny how making billions of dollars from very capitalist enterprises in Shanghai and Hong Kong has a way of changing your favorite color from red to green. Unfortunately, for China, their number one problem in the future is one they created for themselves, and one they cannot remedy. Decades of population control and selectively "harvesting" boys instead of girls will leave them without the ability to sustain the required population to man their industries, farms and services. Their future may not be as bright as some people think it's going to be...and it ain't Bush's fault.

8 posted on 03/05/2006 6:11:24 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Decades of population control and selectively "harvesting" boys instead of girls will leave them without the ability to sustain the required population to man their industries, farms and services.

Or with a restless army that looks outward. I've heard previous male-female imbalances in history led to militarism. Anyone have better info?

9 posted on 03/05/2006 6:28:04 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam

Ya, the deap seated concern they'll get thrown out on their butts.


10 posted on 03/05/2006 7:04:23 PM PST by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Decades of population control and selectively "harvesting" boys instead of girls will leave them without the ability to sustain the required population to man their industries, farms and services.

I disagree. The population shrinking will benefit China in the long-run. Most of China's population today are still poor farmers (who are irrelevant as modern farming equipment can easily replace them), they sure as hell aren't working in the industries and being productive. More and more farmers are also going into industry, but at a gradual pace. So this population decrease is not going to harm the productivity of China's industry very much. The population shrinking will make the air more breatheable and quality of life better, there will be less farmers with nothing to do.
11 posted on 03/06/2006 3:07:33 PM PST by gogoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson