Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution Bill Stirs Debate (Oklahoma House votes 77-10 to permit alternative views)
Associated Press ^ | March 2, 2006 | Tim Talley

Posted on 03/05/2006 10:14:04 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-363 next last
HB 2107
THE ACADEMIC FREEDOM ACT

http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/2005-06HB/HB2107_int.rtf

"Every public school teacher in the State of Oklahoma, shall have the affirmative right and freedom to present scientific information pertaining to the full range of scientific views in any curricula or course of learning.... The rights and privileges contained in the Academic Freedom Act apply when topics are taught that may generate controversy, such as biological or chemical origins of life." (etc.)

1 posted on 03/05/2006 10:14:07 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Junior

Archive.


2 posted on 03/05/2006 10:18:39 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

All those against evolution - raise your tails ant throw a coconut at the vote counter. 77 coconuts.


3 posted on 03/05/2006 10:23:54 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Teaching the full range of scientific views on evolution will delay high school graduation by half a dozen years.

I guess they anticipate teaching something compatible with Genesis, but they will have to dig pretty deep to find peer-reviewed publications giving them what they really want.

Even the ID advocates accept common descent, so what do these guys expect to be taught as an alternative?


4 posted on 03/05/2006 10:25:57 AM PST by js1138 (</I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

What process or mechanism required by evolution has not been observed?


6 posted on 03/05/2006 10:28:21 AM PST by js1138 (</I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: js1138

Um... the origin.


8 posted on 03/05/2006 10:31:59 AM PST by momincombatboots (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: salexander

Macroevolution is not a process; it is the result of an accumulation of changes. Evolution does not involve any large changes from one generation to another. No parent ever gives birth to a child of a different species. That is Hollywood evolution. No biologist in the last century has suggested such a thing happens.


9 posted on 03/05/2006 10:34:01 AM PST by js1138 (</I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Um... that's abiogenesis, not evolution.


10 posted on 03/05/2006 10:34:58 AM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

They better watch out! A federal judge has decided there is NO FREEDOM for local school districts to set curriculum.


11 posted on 03/05/2006 10:37:19 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Origin of what? The origin of life is not addressed by evolution.

But let me ask a question. Where are you going to go with this argment when molecular biology eventually presents a naturalistic scenerio for biogenesis?

I don't expect to live long enough to see this, but your children might. How are you preparing them for advances in science?


12 posted on 03/05/2006 10:37:47 AM PST by js1138 (</I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
Silly... Something somewhere assembled itself somehow and then someway or another drew energy from somewhere..., and that's how life began. It's all very scientific and observable...
13 posted on 03/05/2006 10:43:49 AM PST by zeeba neighba (:=))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba

I'll ask you the same question. How are you preparing your children for advances in science?

It seems rather risky to say that molecular biology will never understand biogenesis. What will happen to the faith of your children or grandchildren when things you say are impossible become routine?


14 posted on 03/05/2006 10:47:51 AM PST by js1138 (</I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: js1138

:>)


15 posted on 03/05/2006 10:51:15 AM PST by zeeba neighba (:=)virtuous ignore for trolls, scolls and assorted molls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Just what in the heck are they thinking???

"EVOLUTION" is a proven thing. Just ask some of the people here on FR...who will gladly point out that those who ask questions....who have some doubt about "EVOLUTION"....are really stupid.

redrock

16 posted on 03/05/2006 10:56:23 AM PST by redrock ("How God Created us...I have no real Idea. Telling God how He 'has to do things'...is not my way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Public schools are failures because only a few parents absolutely demand a teaching curriculum geared to success in this world.......Darwin vs Creationism is now at the fore....Chemistry, math, and physics are secondary.....Just too pathetic!!!

Teachers are unskilled in their art, classrooms have little discipline, and subjects such as ebonics, new math, and phonetic spelling have taken over. The teacher's unions love this as they get more tax money and better salaries and benefits.

17 posted on 03/05/2006 11:06:33 AM PST by pop-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: salexander
Any number of competent scientists have squarely stated that no amount of microevolution could bridge the gap to macroevolution.

Perhaps you'd like to state the number. Preferably as a percentage of bologists.

20 posted on 03/05/2006 11:28:10 AM PST by js1138 (</I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-363 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson