I can't understand whyn such buffoons think they are the keepers of knowledge.
The chimp genome *itself* is not irrelevant.
That particular study of the chimp genome you referenced was.
Then you cut and pasted a bunch of stuff that nothing to do with anything in a futile attempt at a smoke screen.
I can't understand whyn such buffoons think they are the keepers of knowledge.
I never proclaimed to be the "keeper" of any knowledge, however unlike you I actually make an effort to *comprehend* what I read.
Try it sometime.