In ID who do you assume the designer is?
ID is the claim the design can be detected without any a priori assumptions about the designer.
Its advocates have presented a range of intricately interlocking parts of various organisms to show that they must have been designed by a great intelligence.
I'm doing the opposite, arguing that the RLN is evidence of a stupid designer.
AFAIK, the great majority of IDers assume that God (or Allah) is the designer, but the panspermia enthusiasts, Scientologists, Raelians, et al have a different one in mind