[CarolinaGuitarman]

" That's whom I thought you were accusing of lying, and I doubt very much showing that a Freeper is lying would get you banned."

I am not sure why you thought I was going to post FReeper creationists lying. Especially when the links I provided clearly were about prominent creationists. Oh, that's right... you are too afraid to see that evidence.

As for your ignorance about the rules here, I'll imagine you really don't know.

" Concerning Talk Origins links. What I scanned appeared to much, if not mostly, ad hominem. It shouldn't be taken seriously."

In other words, you didn't read it and can't refute it.

[Tribune7]

In other words, you didn't read it and can't refute it.

I did read. It's hard to refute ad hominem. Is Gish/Wells etc. giving incorrect info, because they are lying? Or just being sloppy or stubborn? Or are they giving basically correct info but are the victims of false witness?

The Talk Origin stuff had a lot of ad hominem and charges filled with ad hominem should not be taken seriously.