Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon

What you missing is that scientists exist in insufficient numbers who honor the system, and can be trusted with it.

But maybe you really believe scientists are more trustworthy, on the whole, than anyone else.


"But why should we trust them to correct themselves?"

Better, why should we trust any of them to 'honor the method'?


375 posted on 03/06/2006 4:25:52 AM PST by gobucks (Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator

My freeper homepage appears to be gone. Is this a software glitch, or is it something else? Is there some way I can recover that material?


376 posted on 03/06/2006 4:42:09 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

To: gobucks; Ichneumon
I think there is a point that is missing from this conversation and that is the adversarial nature of science in general.

From conversations with a number of scientists I have an understanding that when it comes to their's and other's work, they are not afraid to tear apart the work of even their friends if it looks susceptible to criticism. In fact it seems a rite of passage to present a paper at a conference and successfully deflate the rather pointed questions from the assembled crowd of fellow scientists. This is far from a conspiracy and seem to work well in filtering out poorly produced research.

633 posted on 03/06/2006 4:21:53 PM PST by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson