Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tallhappy
Well let's see, you're saying literally that 1) I don't understand what I posted and 2) I don't know anything about stem cells except media hype.

It's elementary logic that if either part of a conjunction is false, the conjuction is also false. Since I do understand what I posted, your statement is false and so naturally I disagree with it.

However I also understand more than media hype about stem cells. While there's no such thing in ordinary logic as being doubly wrong, you seem to have done it.

352 posted on 03/05/2006 11:46:38 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]


To: edsheppa
Ed, your answer was still an evasion of the topic.

Embryonic stem cells are not considered potential revolutionary cures and adult stem cells are considered much more likely to be of use.

Why do you evade the actual topic?

416 posted on 03/06/2006 6:45:49 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson