It's elementary logic that if either part of a conjunction is false, the conjuction is also false. Since I do understand what I posted, your statement is false and so naturally I disagree with it.
However I also understand more than media hype about stem cells. While there's no such thing in ordinary logic as being doubly wrong, you seem to have done it.
Embryonic stem cells are not considered potential revolutionary cures and adult stem cells are considered much more likely to be of use.
Why do you evade the actual topic?