Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Sorry, that should have been directed to you.

BTW, How about you personally from what you seen while lurk or post on crevo threads? Can you cite lies told by creationists?

229 posted on 03/05/2006 7:17:02 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
" BTW, How about you personally from what you seen while lurk or post on crevo threads? Can you cite lies told by creationists?"

Here's a few:

Darwin recanted on his deathbed.

Darwin is often quote mined here saying that he can't explain the eye and it gives him chills, when he goes on to say how evolution solves this *problem*. He is quite often quoted like that; take a rhetorical question/problem he raises and neglect to show how he actually answered it, trying to make it look like Darwin had no answer.

The allegation that early evolutionists latched on to evolution not because of the evidence but because of it's ramifications for sexual morality. They usually quote Julian or Aldous Huxley, though neither said anything like that.

Claiming that there is no evidence for evolution.

Your refusal to even look at the dozens of lies regarding quotations chronicled at TalkOrigins attests to your unwillingness to face the facts.
234 posted on 03/05/2006 7:26:43 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7

if gross deliberate repeated misrepresentations of what evolution-supporting FReepers have posted on a thread qualify as creo-lies, then yes: I could provide examples.

if grotesque creo strawman renditions of the ToE -reiterated despite frequent correction- qualify as creo-lies, then sure: plenty are available.

if absurd misuse of half-baked versions of the second law of thermodynamics -also reiterated endlessly despite frequent correction- qualify as creo-lies, then absolutely: there is an abundancy of exemplars to cite.

there's only one problem: as you may be aware, the Almighty Mods have required us to abstain from too harshly nailing the creationist wing for their falsehoods.

Meeting your request would qualify as the proscribed action.

If you knew this when you asked, then you are engaged in baiting with malice aforethought.
If you were unaware of this before now, then any repetition of the request shall be malicious.


235 posted on 03/05/2006 7:26:49 PM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
BTW, How about you personally from what you seen while lurk or post on crevo threads? Can you cite lies told by creationists?

I have at times wondered if there even can be such a thing as an honest creationist. The tiny few who show some responsiveness to reality are a drop in the ocean. I will not embarass the few whom I have noted lest the rest of you kill them.

236 posted on 03/05/2006 7:27:08 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson