[curiosity]

Still, Miller & Levine are not the only textbook authors & I wouldn't be surprised if some district somewhere is using a book that still has them.

Perhaps, though I know of none. If you want to make this accusation, the burder of proof is on you. Please cite an example of a textbook continuing to use the fraudulant drawings. Otherwise, retract your accusation.

[Tribune7]

If you want to make this accusation, the burder of proof is on you.

I didn't make an accusation. I expressed an opinion.

Otherwise, retract your accusation.

Sorry, friend. My opinion is what it is. Since our textbooks publishers waited decades before dumping Haeckel, why should I not have the opinion that there is a chance they may still be negligent?

A better question is why do you trust them?