Death penalty retains support - Field Poll majority of Californians support the death penalty

A new Field Poll showing that a majority of Californians support the death penalty is reassuring people on both sides of the debate.

Following the executions of Stanley "Tookie" Williams and Clarence Ray Allen in late 2005 and the recent legal wrangling concerning the delayed lethal injection of Michael Morales, the February poll shows 63 percent of all responders favor capital punishment and 32 percent oppose it, continuing a decadeslong trend of strong statewide support.

Among registered voters, 67 percent support capital punishment and 29 percent oppose it.

Currently, 650 condemned inmates are on Death Row in California, where lawmakers re-instituted capital punishment in 1978. Thirty-eight other states also execute convicted criminals.

Death penalty advocates and their foes both find solace within the Rorschach blot of polling data released today.

Those in favor of the death penalty are encouraged that public approval has held up about 2-to-1 and 3-to-1 or higher since the late 1970s.

"The base question, I think, shows support (staying) reasonably steady," said Kent Scheidegger, director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a national pro-death penalty organization based in Sacramento.

Statewide support peaked in the mid-1980s at 83 percent, up from the low of 49 percent in 1956, according to the Field Poll.

The high approval numbers rose along with the high crime rates of the 1980s and have remained above the current 63 percent partly because of people's confidence in the justice system, Scheidegger said.

"In the '60s and mid-70s, we had a very different system and a lot more people then thought we had and unfair system," he said. "We (now) have the death penalty for a smaller range of crimes and a more thorough review than in the old days."

Anti-capital punishment forces, however, point out that the poll also shows a 20 percentage point drop in support from 1985.

"We're actually very encouraged by the numbers being in the low 60s in terms of general support and with almost 40 percent saying that they think the death penalty is not being applied fairly. Historically, those are great numbers," said Lance Lindsey, director of the anti-death penalty group Death Penalty Focus.

The Field Poll shows that 48 percent of responders think the death penalty is applied fairly and "free of error" and 39 percent think it is not. That is down from two years ago, when 58 percent thought it was applied fairly and 31 percent did not.

Stefanie Faucher, the Death Penalty Focus program director, said the main poll question was too narrow and didn't tap into real feelings about the death penalty.

"When a more complex question is asked, when people are given a choice between two options . . . more people prefer life without parole," she said, citing a 2004 poll by the Public Policy Institute of California that shows support for capital punishment dropped to 38 percent when life sentences were given as an alternative to death.

Still, Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation criticizes the poll for comparing different types of data on the question of death penalty fairness. The current poll is of all types of adults, while the 2004 poll was of registered voters only.

"I think a lot of people could interpret it as 'there are never any mistakes at trial.' Free of errors is a pretty extreme statement," Scheidegger said. "I don't think that the people insist on 100 percent (error free) because no human system is 100 percent."

"The opposition have been trying to sell the people that nothing less than absolute perfection is acceptable and I don't think the people have bought it."

The telephone survey of 500 adults -- including 343 registered voters -- was taken in English and Spanish during the last weeks of February. It has a margin for error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points when polling all types of adults and of plus or minus 5.5 percentage points when polling only registered voters.

"I would say that (the death penalty) is sort of like other hot button issues in California, like abortion," said Mark DiCamillo, director of the nonpartisan Field Poll.

"The state is clearly pro-choice. There would be much resistance to overturn that right, but the pro-life people try to nibble around the edges," he said.

"I think with the death penalty, you have the same kind of situation. It's very unlikely you're going to change people's minds about doing away with it, but you can change some public policy around the subsidiary issues."

Life With Out Parole is deceptive, since a life sentence is different in every state it can be as little as 10 years or as much as 60 years or somewhere inbetween. Also LWOP sentences can be commuted, can be appealed, and can be negated by later judges or legislators looking to cut cost by emptying out the prisons.

The REAL Death Penalty in the US: A Review Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters

NOTE: Detailed review of any of the below topics, or others, is available upon request

In this brief format, the reality of the death penalty in the United States, is presented, with the hope that the media, public policy makers and others will make a more responsible effort to present a balanced view on this sanction.

Innocence Issues

Death Penalty opponents have proclaimed that 121 inmates have been "released from death row with evidence of their innocence", in the US, since the modern death penalty era began, post Furman v Georgia (1972).

That number is a fraud.

Those opponents have intentionally included both the factually innocent (the "I truly had nothing to do with the murder" cases) and the legally innocent (the "I got off because of legal errors" cases), thereby fraudulently raising the "innocent" numbers.

Death penalty opponents claim that 24 such innocence cases are in Florida. The Florida Commission on Capital Cases found that 4 of those 24 MIGHT be innocent -- an 83% error rate in death penalty opponents claims. If that error rate is consistent, nationally, that would indicate that 20 of the alleged 121 innocents MIGHT be actually innocent -- a 0.3% actual guilt error rate for the over 7500 sentenced to death since 1973. None were executed.

It is often claimed that 23 innocents have been executed in the US since 1900. Nonsense. Even the authors of that "23 innocents executed" study proclaimed "We agree with our critics, we never proved those (23) executed to be innocent; we never claimed that we had." While no one would claim that an innocent has never been executed, there is no proof of an innocent executed in the US, at least since 1900.

No one disputes that innocents are found guilty, within all countries. However, when scrutinizing death penalty opponents claims, we find that when reviewing the accuracy of verdicts and the post conviction thoroughness of discovering those actually innocent incarcerated, that the US death penalty process may be the most accurate criminal justice sanction in the world. Under real world scenario, not executing murderers will always put many more innocents at risk, than will ever be put at risk of execution.

(NOTE: The Professor Liebman/Columbia U. report finding a 68% error rate in death penalty cases has many errors of its own. Please review http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/Liebman/Liebman.htm)

Deterrence Issues

Eight recent studies, all finding for deterrence.

One study, specifically, found that moratoriums on the death penalty sacrificed innocent lives. All of the other studies confirm that conclusion.

All the studies which have not found a deterrent effect of the death penalty have refused to say that it does not deter some. The studies finding for deterrence state such. Confusion arises when people think that a simple comparison of murder rates and executions, or the lack thereof, can tell the tale of deterrence. It cannot.

Both high and low murder rates are found within death penalty and non death penalty jurisdictions, be it Singapore, South Africa, Sweden or Japan, or the US states of Michigan and Delaware. Many factors are involved in such evaluations. Reason and common sense tell us that it would be remarkable to find that the most severe criminal sanction -- execution -- deterred none. No one is foolish enough to suggest that the potential for negative consequences does not deter the behavior of some. Therefore, regardless of jurisdiction, having the death penalty will always be an added deterrent to murders, over and above any lesser punishments.

Racial issues

White murderers are twice as likely to be executed in the US as are black murderers and are executed, on average, 12 months more quickly than are black death row inmates.

It is often stated that it is the race of the victim which decides who is prosecuted in death penalty cases. Although blacks and whites make up about an equal number of murder victims, capital cases are 6 times more likely to involve white victim murders than black victim murders. This, so the logic goes, is proof that the US only cares about white victims.

Hardly. Only capital murders, not all murders, are subject to a capital indictment. Generally, a capital murder is limited to murders plus secondary aggravating factors, such as murders involving burglary, carjacking, rape, and additional murders, such as police murders, serial and multiple murders. White victims are, overwhelmingly, the victims under those circumstances, in ratios nearly identical to the cases found on death row.

Any other racial combinations of defendants and/or their victims in death penalty cases, is a reflection of the crimes committed and not any racial bias within the system, as confirmed by studies from the Rand Corporation (1991), Smith College (1994), U of Maryland (2002), New Jersey Supreme Court (2003) and by a view of criminal justice statistics, within a framework of the secondary aggravating factors necessary for capital indictments.

Class issues

No one disputes that wealthier defendants can hire better lawyers and, therefore, should have a legal advantage over their poorer counterparts. The US has executed about 0.15% of all murderers since new death penalty statutes were enacted in 1973. Is there evidence that wealthier capital murderers are less likely to be executed than their poorer ilk, based upon the proportion of capital murders committed by different those different economic groups?

Arbitrary and capricious

About 10% of all murders within the US might qualify for a death penalty eligible trial. That would be about 55,000 murders since 1973. We have sentenced 7,300 murderers to death since then, or 14% of those eligible. I doubt that there is any other crime which receives a higher percentage of maximum sentences, when mandatory sentences are not available. Based upon that, as well as pre trial, trial, appellate and clemency/commutation realities, the US death penalty is likely the least arbitrary and capricious criminal sanctions in the world.

Christianity and the death penalty

The two most authoritative New Testament scholars, Saints Augustine and Aquinas, provide substantial biblical and theological support for the death penalty. Even the most well known anti death penalty personality in the US, Sister Helen Prejean, author of Dead Man Walking, states that "It is abundantly clear that the Bible depicts murder as a capital crime for which death is considered the appropriate punishment, and one is hard pressed to find a biblical 'proof text' in either the Hebrew Testament or the New Testament which unequivocally refutes this. Even Jesus' admonition 'Let him without sin cast the first stone,' when He was asked the appropriate punishment for an adulteress (John 8:7) -- the Mosaic Law prescribed death -- should be read in its proper context. This passage is an 'entrapment' story, which sought to show Jesus' wisdom in besting His adversaries. It is not an ethical pronouncement about capital punishment." A thorough review of Pope John Paul II's current position, reflects a reasoning that should be recommending more executions.

Cost Issues

All studies finding the death penalty to be more expensive than life without parole exclude important factors, such as (1) geriatric care costs, recently found to be $69,0000/yr/inmate, (2) the death penalty cost benefit of providing for plea bargains to a maximum life sentence, a huge cost savings to the state, (3) the death penalty cost benefit of both enhanced deterrence and enhanced incapacitation, at $5 million per innocent life spared, and, furthermore, (4) many of the alleged cost comparison studies are highly deceptive.

Polling data

64% of Americans support the death penalty (Gallup, 10/06). Five months earlier, it was 74%, of which 53% say the death penalty is not used enough. Catholics showed 70% support. (Gallup 5/05). Support was 74% in 2003, as well (Gallup 5/03). 74% is within the margin of error of the all time high for general support -- 80% (Gallup, 1994)

Support is actually higher. 81% of the American people supported the execution of Timothy McVeigh, with only 16% opposed. (Gallup 5/2/01). "(T)his view appears to be the consensus of all major groups in society, including men, women, whites, nonwhites, "liberals" and "conservatives." "81% of Connecticut citizens supported the execution of serial rapist/murderer Michael Ross (Jan 2005).

While 81% gave specific case support for Timothy McVeigh's execution, Gallup also showed a 65% support when asked a general "do you support capital punishment for murderers" question. (Gallup, 6/10/01).

That wide 16% "error rate", between general support and specific case support, is likely due to the differences in (1) the widespread coverage of anti death penalty claims ,without the balance of contradicting those false claims, producing 65% general support, and (2) the absence of that influence when looking at individual cases when the public knows the crimes, the guilt of the murderer, and absent the anti death penalty bias factor, producing 81% specific case support.

22% of those supporting McVeigh's execution are, generally, against the death penalty (Gallup 5/02/01). In fact, they are not opposed to the death penalty, but favor it under specific circumstances, just as it is imposed, judicially. This provides firm evidence that death penalty support is much wider and deeper than expressed with the general death penalty polling question.

Whatever your feelings are toward the death penalty, a fair accounting of how it is applied should be demanded.

Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491, Houston, Texas

Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, CBS, CNN, C-Span, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS, BBC and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Report, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.

Pro death penalty sites

www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm
http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm
www.dpinfo.com/
www.prodeathpenalty.com http://www.prodeathpenalty.org/
http://www.yesdeathpenalty.com/ (Sweden)
www.wesleylowe.com/cp.html
www.vuac.org/capital

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.