Posted on 03/04/2006 4:01:17 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
The authors of a US government-sponsored report claim to have delivered the first reliable guide into judging the safety and reliability of open source software.
The report, backed by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has evaluated 31 popular open source packages searching for defects that will cause "hard crashes" - problems that leave users open to hackers or cause downtime.
And fortunately for many a young Silicon Valley start-up and entrepreneur, the report, conducted by fault tracking specialist Coverity, has effectively given the Linux, Apache, MySQL and Perl/PHP/Python (LAMP) stack a healthy rating.
LAMP "showed significantly better software quality" above the report's baseline with an average of .32 defects per 1,000 lines of code, according to Coverity. The average for open source projects analyzed is .42 per 1,000 lines.
Coverity co-founder Dave Park called the report a first because it provides a single standard to evaluate software from different open source projects. Increasingly, developers use open source form multiple projects to build applications, making it important to provide an overall measurement for things like bugs.
Park told The Register: "This is one clear metric to decide how reliable or secure open source is. No real or proper yardstick existed before."
Coverity's report, Stacking up the LAMP stack: a study of open source quality, was produced as part of a $1.24m, three-year DHS Science and Technology Directorate effort to evaluate and improve the security of open source.
Coverity evaluated 15m lines of open source code with Stamford University's Computer Science Department. The report has identified bugs that can corrupt a machine's memory space, memory leaks, buffer overruns and crashes. Coverity said it would now engage with open source developers to improve code, and identify potential reasons for why some projects have more bugs than others.
Linus Torvalds is famous for constantly disagreeing with Stallman over these zealot matters. His software is GPL. Kinda blows your "GPL=zealot" theory away.
and a majority of that code having it's copyright transfered to Stallman's organization the FSF
Now that one I haven't heard. Source, please?
Linux was but a cheap clone of Unix
Actually, it was a Minix clone.
from a foreigner
Them damn foreigners, always ruining things for us pure-blood Americans.
it was it's release under Stallman's GPL that has given it it's rise above BSD.
True, in conjunction with BSD being held back by a baseless lawsuit. Linux was already popular by the time BSD was cleared. The idea of suing over free software instead of competing (hello, SCO) made BSD miss its window of opportunity.
"OSS =/= free" == "OSS != free"
He's just trying to type longhand.
bump
I thought he might be trying to use some programming construct, but in over 20 years of programming in a lot of different languages I've never seen that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.