Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
We need to correct the misconception that is repeatedly spread by the MSM, that we only inspect a fraction of containers.

Do you not realize their is a difference between scanning and inspecting? I guess not.

11 posted on 03/04/2006 12:54:58 PM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SwordofTruth; finnman69; axes_of_weezles; W04Man

This is from June 2005, so it must have been implemented by now:

Nation’s Busiest Seaports to Have Complete Radiation Detection Coverage by End of 2005

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
Contact: 202-282-8010
June 3, 2005

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Michael Chertoff today announced that the nation’s busiest seaports -- Los Angeles/Long Beach, California -- will have complete Radiation Portal Monitor (RPM) coverage by year’s end.

Three terminal locations, at Piers 400, 300 and Trans Pacific, within the Port of Los Angeles are scheduled to go on-line by the end of June. A total of ninety RPMs, which will screen all international container traffic and vehicles exiting the facility for nuclear materials or hidden sources of radiation, will be operational by December 2005.

http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=4530

====

The point is that they look to find the high risk containers, BEFORE they are shipped to the US, inspect the high risk containers, mostly also BEFORE they get here, then have additional screening in the US ports, for radiation.


17 posted on 03/04/2006 1:00:48 PM PST by FairOpinion (Real Conservatives do NOT help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson