Ok,
So he wants to broaden thier minds, and make them think for themselves and says "... What I'm trying to get you to do is think about these issues more in depth and not just to take things from the surface."
If this is true, then why is it he can only voice one side of the argument? The Anti-American one.
My answer: Becuase this is absolutley NOT true. He is only out to indoctrinate, not to teach.
If he was intending to teach, even as controversial a topic as this, why didn't he make arguments in FAVOR of our country and our policies, along side his diatribe against. Why doesn't he have the students look up the truth for themselves, taking both pro and con stances in gradable reports? Maybe even assign it that way so no one feels like they "have to please" the teacher.
People like this have no balance, thus, no ideas.
I had a final question in college that went something like this... Describe in detail how the disappearance of the American Buffalo affected the 1960 Presidential Election. I answered that there was no relationship what so ever and got an "F". Well anyone that hasn't written a text book for a major state university could tell you that there is no corellation, but that doesn't matter in the least.