Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Killer endured harshest penalty — dying a forgotten man behind bars (this guy is off his rocker)
Home News ^ | 03/2/06 | Rick Malwitz's

Posted on 03/03/2006 3:18:29 PM PST by Former Military Chick

Time illustrates how New Jersey has a virtual death penalty that ends in the death of the accused, although it happens without midnight vigils and satellite trucks, under the media radar.

Four days before Christmas in 1981, Richard Williams participated in the murder of New Jersey State Trooper Philip Lamonaco. Because the murder took place prior to 1983 when New Jersey reinstituted the death penalty, Williams was sentenced to 30 years in state prison.

He also had been sentenced to 45 years in federal custody for his participation in an unrelated series of bombings as a member of the United Freedom Front. Among his targets were symbols of "oppression," including Union Carbide, General Motors, IBM and Army and Navy facilities.

Williams died Dec. 7. But who knew? The Easton (Pa.) Express-Times reported his death Sunday, nearly two months later. The Associated Press picked up the Easton story and put it on the wires the next day.

State Police Capt. Al Della Fave said the report of Williams' death was on the State Police Web site in December, but no one in the print media picked it up, he said.

If Williams had been sentenced to death, his story would have been retold often, through a seemingly endless series of appeals in state and federal courts. The convoluted legal process would have cost countless tax dollars.

Instead, Richard Williams just faded away, although not without sympathy. His death was lamented on the online edition of The Nation — a publication of the hard left.

According to author Dan Berger, Williams had been put into isolation in the Lompoc prison in California within hours of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Williams' health deteriorated; he suffered from a heart attack, cancer and hepatitis C, which caused liver failure and led to his death.

After Williams had returned to the prison's general population 10 months later he responded to questions submitted by the Santa Barbara (Calif.) News-Press.

"I do not support the actions of Sept. 11th. It is not something I would do, nor would I advocate it," he wrote.

Williams took credit for the bombings he participated in, telling the newspaper: "I took up revolution in this country because it is my country. I want to see change here. I do not hate the people of the U.S. I do hate the policies the government pursues. I feel it is criminal. And to not try to change it makes me, as a U.S. citizen, complicit in my government's crimes."

"Neither his post-9/11 isolation nor his death captured headlines," reported Berger, who contrasted his death to the death of another Williams — Stanley "Tookie" Williams — whose execution in California on Dec. 12 drew legions of protesters, including Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan and Joan Baez.

Berger continued: "In less than one week, two prisoners have died — flawed men, each of whom had tried in some fashion to promote social justice. One was executed openly and deliberately . . . The other was killed slowly and quietly, because he fought quite literally against the pernicious acts of his own government on behalf of the oppressed people of South Africa and Central America."

Berger made only a passing reference to the murder of Philip Lamonaco.

When Williams was sentenced in 1992, Donna Lamonaco, the officer's widow, told the court: "He fought against the system, but the system fought back. Life in prison is the only life he is suited for, until death."

Williams would spend 13 years on his personal death row.

You could make an argument — in fact, I will make the argument — that Richard Williams suffered the worst fate, dying a forgotten, broken man, while Tookie Williams died a public death, a celebrated martyr to some.

When life in prison means life in prison, allowing nature to take its course, that is a far harsher penalty than death by lethal injection.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cultureofdeath; deathpenalty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: Seadog Bytes
I agree, absolutely. The reason the death penalty isn't quick to the punch is because liberals have made it time-consuming and very expensive to carry out. But the record of zero recidivism is what what makes it superior to every other method of punishment for murder- its 100% effective, fool-proof and iron-clad. It delivers results every time.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

41 posted on 03/03/2006 5:21:46 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
...allowing nature to take its course, that is a far harsher penalty than death by lethal injection.

Bravo Sierra!!! Everybody dies -- it is called "mortality".

At least, with LI, the punk gets to know that society ain't gonna let him hang around and sponge off of us any longer...

42 posted on 03/03/2006 6:09:36 PM PST by TXnMA (TROP: Satan's most successful earthly venture...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Rmalwitz@thnt.com


43 posted on 03/03/2006 8:25:11 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Thank you for adding this to the discussion it was very helpful.


44 posted on 03/03/2006 9:22:39 PM PST by Former Military Chick (Pray for my beloved "No Longer Free State" as he is deployed to IRAQ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Hmm, I sent my response to the editor. I think I will give it until Monday just to see if there is any interest ...

Perhaps than I will send him (or you can) send him the link to this thread ...

There is always other ways to get one's point across.

Thank you for the add'y and comment.


45 posted on 03/03/2006 9:24:45 PM PST by Former Military Chick (Pray for my beloved "No Longer Free State" as he is deployed to IRAQ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Shame on Rick Malwitz?

Nooooo; shame on Dan Berger, whom Mr. Malwitz exposed.

If Williams had been sentenced to death, his story would have been retold often, through a seemingly endless series of appeals in state and federal courts. The convoluted legal process would have cost countless tax dollars.

His death was lamented on the online edition of The Nation — a publication of the hard left.

Berger made only a passing reference to the murder of Philip Lamonaco.

Sounds like this guy is not at all sympathetic to the criminal, though he is anti death penalty. He seems glad the scumbag died behind bars, forgotten & unlamented, exactly as sentenced.

46 posted on 03/03/2006 10:32:00 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

The best punishment for all of these guys...is to send them to middle of Montana....max security place...no work, no books, no one to talk to, only 1 hour per day outside with absolutely no contact with people. You stay in your cell and even eat your meals there. Most of these guys would commit suicide within two years and we'd be out of this whole argument. Once you take away human contact...people slide fast. They have no reason to exist if they can't communicate with someone.


47 posted on 03/03/2006 11:35:26 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
I'm not certain if it was intended, but he certainly made a valid point. That *guaranteed* life can be (not necessarily is) a worse punishment. I imagine that for some, it is a daily living hell. He seemed to imply that there was some justice in the obscurity of the man's life in prison and his death, also. Which is also a valid point.

If his life was indeed hell, then perhaps the sentence was inadvertently appropriate. Am I in favor of life rather than the death penalty. Not at all. We have no way of knowing in advance which is going to be worse for the murderer. Thus, the morally right punishment for a heinous murder is execution.
48 posted on 03/04/2006 5:17:03 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson