Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Changing your tune again? Figures.

No change in tune, maybe if you went back and read it before making snippety little comments, you'd have noticed that.

As for the most corrupt administration, I think that historians will bear out that the Harding Administration was the most corrupt.

Seems they rarely mention one without the other in a toss-up for last place.

924 posted on 03/26/2006 5:07:39 AM PST by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies ]


To: Gianni
No change in tune, maybe if you went back and read it before making snippety little comments, you'd have noticed that.

I did, went way back to post 821 where you first made your claim that he was a cokehead. You were responding to earlier posts from several people refuting stand waitie's idiotic claim that Grant was high on heroin in the Wilderness. Obviously you meant to imply Grant's drug use during the war. When pwoplw pointed out that cocaine wasn't available during the rebellion for Grant to abuse you're suddenly denying it. Par for the course.

Seems they rarely mention one without the other in a toss-up for last place.

Corruption is an easy charge to make because it's definition is open for interpretation. Current Bush administration, Clinton administration, Reagan, Nixon, Truman, you name it. All have had the charge of 'most corrupt administration' made of them. As for Grant and Harding, was the Whiskey Ring worse than Teapot Dome? Was William Belknap worse than Albert Fall? Who knows? A case can be made either way.

925 posted on 03/26/2006 6:09:51 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson