They must ignore 99% of history and grasp at such absurdities as a treaty naming the states is proof that there was no nation called the United States of America. When it should be obvious that the naming of those states was merely a means of identifying the territories so as to protect English and French imperial claims on the North American continent. And it was a subtle means of undermining the concept of the USA as a Nation.
In similiar fashion they are prone to inflating the importance of dated grammatic construction and case into major issues rather than examples of archaic ways of expression. No triviality is too trivial to have them grasping desperately at it in support of an invalid claim.
Pure crap. So much so that scientists should use this as the standard by which all other crap is measured. I have contacted the International Bureau of Weights and Measures on your behalf.
Three paragraphs, and not a single thing you said was true. Not even close enough to pass as truth to the uneducated. You've been spinning too long, and lost your bearings.
You cannot refute the fact that the Colonists thought of themselves as loyal subjects almost up til the War started.
Nor that Britain and France had every incentive to try and break the Union.
Nor that you hang your case on grammatic trivialities which must stand against massive contrary evidence.