Posted on 03/03/2006 6:26:37 AM PST by Leisler
Appears to be a misunderstanding."
why do you say this is a misunderstanding? I must be missing something? Unless you mean it was 6 to 8 Muslim's and not 12 Muslim's like the article states?
Yeah. Sure thing. You bet they will. Uh huh.
Just like the aftermath of Beslan, or any number of pizzeria bombings.
Did you read the article? I just quoted from it.
http://agora.blogsome.com/2006/03/02/cartoonists-daughter-hunted-by-jihadists/
That's the rub. Best I can say is by outlawing specific behaviors. We seem to have eliminated human sacrifice, while allowing the Church of Satan to exist.
Granted, islam is worse than the Church of Satan, but the principle still applies.
Serves me right for not reading ahead...
What's so "unbelievable?" One of the things that muslim terrorists have been doing for decades is seeking out children and murdering them. This isn't anything new.
Muslim terrorists go after the most defensless in any society. They love slaughtering the innocent, usually in the most heinous ways imaginable.
Do you need to be reminded of Belson, Russia? How many school children were killed there? That might still be in your mind, maybe not. How about the recent case in Israel, when terrorists ambushed a woman driving her children in her car. They ran her off the road, then murdered the children while they were still strapped in their car seats. And as an extra, the were sure to fire into the pregnant woman's belly, "just to be sure."
But this is nothing new. When terrorists have invaded Israeli towns, they've shot children in their cribs. Or attacked grade schools. This has been going on for more than 30 years.
Mark
I wouldn't bet on it... The apologists in society will be flooding the media, saying it's not their fault, and practicly blaming the victims.
They honed their skills in going after Israel.
Mark
I keep saying wheat and chaff. If the muslim community does not point out the chaff, then they all go, and I do not mean back to some mud hut somewhere.
Coming soon to the US!
B/c the West it too big a bunch of [w]ussies to defend themselves, their honor, and most important of all, their freedoms! The damned politicos should simply step aside and let the people of this country do it.
It's so clear where this is heading too. It's gonna be civil war at some point as it has to be. Their culture and ours just don't mesh, it is that simple. At present we're simply allowing them to orchestrate their "troop" movements and positioning. So it's really a simple matter of how many people we want to get hurt or killed.
Kind of odd that muslim girls from another school, come looking for you? Maybe ask you to go out in the parking lot. Near a van. A van with men that the little kid doesn't see.
I believe that's how the lured that french young man to his kidnapping, torture, and eventual death.
Mark
FYI, there are already Muslim mosques in Dallas and Arlington area at which terror supporting literature were found. What did we do? Nothin!
That article down plays what may have taken place it seems to me.
We will never have the MSM "on our side". But it doesn't matter because these dinosaurs are losing credibility and audience share at an alarming (for them) pace. They are becoming extinct and no longer wield the power they once posessed. Now, it is the internet that is becoming dominant in the dissemination of news.
One more attack on U.S. soil and you can forget all about "limited". You want to wait for it. I don't.
Your "limited war is the only way to go" is a defeatist approach. It is the only way to go if you prefer a slow and agonizing loss over victory. You are fooling yourself if you think the battle against Islamic terrorists can be confined to a "limited war". They will only grow stronger while we twiddle and twaddle, lost in a perpetual fog of multicultural poltical correctness.
Perhaps it is time for an amendment to declare Islam is NOT a religion on U.S. soil. 1400 years of history says it is totally incompatible with civilization.
As you put it though MSM is changing, the sooner MSM(of today) goes away the better off we will be. But remember most large business likes MSM just as they are, keep the public uninformed.
I still think it is better to take out our enemy one at a time(if it can be done) vs all at one time.
Not so much big business--mostly all levels of government. But it still doesn't matter--the MSM is dwindling into insignificance.
"I still think it is better to take out our enemy one at a time(if it can be done) vs all at one time."
Extremely doubtful we will have that luxury. Nearly every Islamic country has contributed fighters to the terrorists. If they don't knock it off, we're going to have to attack those countries.
Steve you posted; "How are you going to do that and keep the first ammendment?"
My Comments:
1)The operative word here is PRACTICING.
2)Practicing Islam calls for eliminating non-believers and installing Islamic Law(Shari'a)
3)How are you going to keep the the first amendment once we are under Shari'a Law?
NOTE! Point two is equivalent to plotting the overthrow of our government. This is illegal, therefore practicing Islam should be illegal.
To get a better understanding of what we are up against see this post. Islam's March Against the West
What happened in Bosnia is another example of how ISLAMIC Jihad works.
Bosnian president Alijah Izetbegovic, authored “The Islamic Declaration”, in which he stated: “The shortest definition of the Islamic order defines it as unity of faith and law, upbringing and force, ideals and interests, spiritual community and State…a Muslim generally does not exist as an individual… […] There can be no peace or coexistence between ‘the Islamic faith’ and non-Islamic social and political institutions.”
Pursuant to Izetbegovic’s end game, writes Michigan-based Balkans writer and historian Carl Savich, “the Bosnian Muslim faction engaged in propaganda, staged massacres, killed Bosnian Muslim civilians to garner sympathy [e.g. the Markale Marketplace bombings in 1994 and 95, and firing mortars from hospitals to elicit return attacks] and used civilian hostages or shields to further its propaganda of victimization.” The widely cited 2002 official Dutch report on Srebrenica seems to confirm the use of such tactics. As BBC.com reported that year, the Dutch Government “pins part of the blame on the Bosnian Muslims themselves, saying the Bosnian army had provoked attacks.” Srebrenica Muslims “ravaged and ransacked neighbouring ethnic Serb villages,” continues Kliphuis, “killing and maiming the residents, who were often too old to offer any resistance….The Serb villages were then set on fire.” After his role in killing up to 2,000 Serbs, Oric himself fled Srebrenica just before it was stormed by the Bosnian Serb army.
This ultimately led to the USA(Clinton) bombing the hell out of the Serbs. And most recently the trial of Milosevic. (see this thread.)
One of the most enlightening interveiw/discussions I have seen is this one at Frontpage.com The Legacy of Jihad
Excerpt:
And lastly, to end on a truly optimistic note, MEMRI recently uncovered that most scarce, but cherished commodity—Dr. Iqbal Al-Gharbi, a Muslim reformer willing to acknowledge, and offer mea culpa for the living legacy of jihad (including jihad slavery), and dhimmitude.
Al-Gharbi on jihad: “We still insist that we are always the victims, and that we are always innocent. Our history is angelic, our imperialism was a welcome conquest [futuhat], our invaders [ghuzah] were liberators, our violence was a holy Jihad, our murderers were Shahids…”
Sorry for the delayed response. I am short of time and my computer has been down. I'll try to do better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.