Posted on 03/02/2006 10:36:59 PM PST by politicket
Here is the Colorado Revised Statute related to firing a public school teacher. Talk about job security!
22-63-302. Procedure for dismissal - judicial review.
Statute text (1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (11) of this section, a teacher shall be dismissed in the manner prescribed by subsections (2) to (10) of this section.
(2) The chief administrative officer of the employing school district may recommend that the board dismiss a teacher based upon one or more of the grounds stated in section 22-63-301. If such a recommendation is made to the board, the chief administrative officer, within three days after the board meeting at which the recommendation is made, shall mail a written notice of intent to dismiss to the teacher. The notice of intent to dismiss shall include a copy of the reasons for dismissal, a copy of this article, and all exhibits which the chief administrative officer intends to submit in support of his or her prima facie case against the teacher including a list of witnesses to be called by the chief administrative officer, addresses and telephone numbers of the witnesses, and all pertinent documentation in the possession of the chief administrative officer relative to the circumstances surrounding the charges. Additional witnesses and exhibits in support of the chief administrative officer's prima facie case may be added as provided in subsection (6) of this section. The notice and copy of the charges shall be sent by certified mail to said teacher at his or her address last known to the secretary of the board. The notice shall advise the teacher of his or her rights and the procedures under this section.
(3) If a teacher objects to the grounds given for the dismissal, the teacher may file with the chief administrative officer a written notice of objection and a request for a hearing. Such written notice shall be filed within five working days after receipt by the teacher of the notice of dismissal. If the teacher fails to file the written notice within said time, such failure shall be deemed to be a waiver of the right to a hearing and the dismissal shall be final; except that the board of education may grant a hearing upon a determination that the failure to file written notice for a hearing was due to good cause. If the teacher files a written notice of objection, the teacher shall continue to receive regular compensation from the time the board received the dismissal recommendation from the chief administrative officer pursuant to subsection (2) of this section until the board acts on the hearing officer's recommendation pursuant to subsection (9) of this section, but in no event beyond one hundred days; except that the teacher shall not receive regular compensation upon being charged criminally with an offense for which a license, certificate, endorsement, or authorization is required to be denied, annulled, suspended, or revoked due to a conviction, pursuant to section 22-60.5-107 (2.5). If the final disposition of the case does not result in a conviction and the teacher has not been dismissed pursuant to the provisions of this section, the board shall reinstate the teacher, effective as of the date of the final disposition of the case. Within ten days after the reinstatement, the board shall provide the teacher with back pay and lost benefits and shall restore lost service credit.
(4) (a) If the teacher requests a hearing, it shall be conducted before an impartial hearing officer selected jointly by the teacher and the chief administrative officer. The hearing officer shall be selected no later than five working days following the receipt by the chief administrative officer of the teacher's written notice of objection. If the teacher and the chief administrative officer fail to agree on the selection of a hearing officer, they shall request assignment of an administrative law judge by the department of personnel to act as the hearing officer.
(b) Hearing officers shall be impartial individuals with experience in the conducting of hearings and with experience in labor or employment matters.
(c) Expenses of the hearing officer shall be paid from funds of the school district.
(5) (a) Within three working days after selection, the hearing officer shall set the date of the prehearing conference and the date of the hearing, which shall commence within the following thirty days. The hearing officer shall give the teacher and the chief administrative officer written notice of the dates for the prehearing conference and for the hearing including the time and the place therefor.
(b) One of the purposes of the prehearing conference shall be to limit, to the extent possible, the amount of evidence to be presented at the hearing.
(c) The parties and their counsel shall be required to attend the prehearing conference with the hearing officer.
(6) (a) Within ten days after selection of the hearing officer, the teacher shall provide to the chief administrative officer a copy of all exhibits to be presented at the hearing and a list of all witnesses to be called, including the addresses and telephone numbers of the witnesses. Within seven days after the teacher submits his or her exhibits and witness list, the chief administrative officer and the teacher may supplement their exhibits and witness lists. After completion of the seven-day period, additional witnesses and exhibits may not be added except upon a showing of good cause.
(b) Neither party shall be allowed to take depositions of the other party's witnesses or to submit interrogatories to the other party. The affidavit of a witness may be introduced into evidence if such witness is unavailable at the time of the hearing.
(7) (a) Hearings held pursuant to this section shall be open to the public unless either the teacher or the chief administrative officer requests a private hearing before the hearing officer, but no findings of fact or recommendations shall be adopted by the hearing officer in any private hearing. The procedures for the conduct of the hearing shall be informal, and rules of evidence shall not be strictly applied except as necessitated in the opinion of the hearing officer; except that the hearing officer shall comply with the Colorado rules of evidence in excluding hearsay testimony.
(b) The hearing officer may receive or reject evidence and testimony, administer oaths, and, if necessary, subpoena witnesses.
(c) At any hearing, the teacher has the right to appear in person with or without counsel, to be heard and to present testimony of witnesses and all evidence bearing upon his proposed dismissal, and to cross-examine witnesses. By entering an appearance on behalf of the teacher or the chief administrative officer, counsel agrees to be prepared to commence the hearing within the time limitations of this section and to proceed expeditiously once the hearing has begun. All school district records pertaining to the teacher shall be made available for the use of the hearing officer or the teacher.
(d) An audiotaped record shall be made of the hearing, and, if the teacher files an action for review pursuant to the provisions of subsection (10) of this section, the teacher and the school district shall share equally in the cost of transcribing the record; except that, if a party is awarded attorney fees and costs pursuant to paragraph (e) of subsection (10) of this section, that party shall be reimbursed for that party's share of the transcript costs by the party against whom attorney fees and costs were awarded.
(e) Any hearing held pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be completed within six working days after commencement, unless extended by the hearing officer on a showing of good cause, and neither party shall have more than three days to present its case in chief. Neither party may present more than ten witnesses at the hearing, except upon a showing of good cause.
(8) The chief administrative officer shall have the burden of proving that the recommendation for the dismissal of the teacher was for the reasons given in the notice of dismissal and that the dismissal was made in accordance with the provisions of this article. Where unsatisfactory performance is a ground for dismissal, the chief administrative officer shall establish that the teacher had been evaluated pursuant to the written system to evaluate licensed personnel adopted by the school district pursuant to section 22-9-106. The hearing officer shall review the evidence and testimony and make written findings of fact thereon. The hearing officer shall make only one of the two following recommendations: The teacher be dismissed or the teacher be retained. A recommendation to retain a teacher shall not include any conditions on retention. The findings of fact and the recommendation shall be issued by the hearing officer not later than twenty days after the conclusion of the hearing and shall be forwarded to said teacher and to the board.
(9) The board shall review the hearing officer's findings of fact and recommendation, and it shall enter its written order within twenty days after the date of the hearing officer's findings and recommendation. The board shall take one of the three following actions: The teacher be dismissed; the teacher be retained; or the teacher be placed on a one-year probation; but, if the board dismisses the teacher over the hearing officer's recommendation of retention, the board shall make a conclusion, giving its reasons therefor, which must be supported by the hearing officer's findings of fact, and such conclusion and reasons shall be included in its written order. The secretary of the board shall cause a copy of said order to be given immediately to the teacher and a copy to be entered into the teacher's local file.
(10) (a) If the board dismisses the teacher pursuant to the provisions of subsection (9) of this section, the teacher may file an action for review in the court of appeals in accordance with the provisions of this subsection (10), in which action the board shall be made the party defendant. Such action for review shall be heard in an expedited manner and shall be given precedence over all other civil cases, except cases arising under the "Workers' Compensation Act of Colorado", articles 40 to 47 of title 8, C.R.S., and cases arising under the "Colorado Employment Security Act", articles 70 to 82 of title 8, C.R.S.
(b) An action for review shall be commenced by the service of a copy of the petition upon the board of the school district and filing the same with the court of appeals within twenty days after the written order of dismissal made by the board. The petition shall state the grounds upon which the review is sought. After the filing of the action for review in the court of appeals, such action shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by rule 3.1 of the Colorado appellate rules.
(c) The action for review shall be based upon the record before the hearing officer. The court of appeals shall review such record to determine whether the action of the board was arbitrary or capricious or was legally impermissible.
(d) In the action for review, if the court of appeals finds a substantial irregularity or error made during the hearing before the hearing officer, the court may remand the case for further hearing.
(e) Upon request of the teacher, if the teacher is ordered reinstated by the court of appeals, or upon request of the board, if the board's decision to dismiss the teacher is affirmed by the court of appeals, the court of appeals shall determine whether the nonprevailing party's appeal or defense on appeal lacked substantial justification. If the court of appeals determines that the nonprevailing party's appeal or defense on appeal lacked substantial justification, the court of appeals shall determine the amount of and enter a judgment against the nonprevailing party for reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred on appeal to the court of appeals. Any judgment entered pursuant to this paragraph (e) may be subject to stay as provided in rule 41.1 of the Colorado appellate rules.
(f) Further appeal to the supreme court from a determination of the court of appeals may be made only upon a writ of certiorari issued in the discretion of the supreme court. Upon request of the teacher, if the teacher is ordered reinstated by the supreme court, or upon motion of the board, if the board's decision to dismiss is affirmed by the supreme court, the supreme court shall determine whether the nonprevailing party's appeal or defense on appeal to the supreme court lacked substantial justification. If the supreme court determines that the nonprevailing party's appeal or defense on appeal to the supreme court lacked substantial justification, the court shall determine the amount of and enter a judgment against the nonprevailing party for reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred on appeal to the supreme court. Any judgment entered pursuant to this paragraph (f) may be subject to stay as provided in rule 41.1 of the Colorado appellate rules.
(11) (a) The board of a school district may take immediate action to dismiss a teacher, without a hearing, notwithstanding subsections (2) to (10) of this section, pending the final outcome of judicial review or when the time for seeking review has elapsed, when the teacher is convicted, pleads nolo contendere, or receives a deferred sentence for:
(I) A violation of any law of this state or any counterpart municipal law of this state involving unlawful behavior pursuant to any of the following statutory provisions: Sections 18-3-305, 18-6-302, and 18-6-701, C.R.S., or section 18-6-301, C.R.S., or part 4 of article 3, part 4 of article 6, and part 4 of article 7 of title 18, C.R.S.; or
(II) A violation of any law of this state, any municipality of this state, or the United States involving the illegal sale of controlled substances, as defined in section 12-22-303 (7), C.R.S.
(b) A certified copy of the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction of a conviction, the acceptance of a guilty plea, a plea of nolo contendere, or a deferred sentence shall be conclusive evidence for the purposes of this subsection (11).
It's up to folks in his DISTRICT..
If they go the School board with pikes and fiery torches, he's probably gone, (or at least his contract doesn't get renewed)...
Yeah, and it gives him the opportunity to find employment at a different school district. Isn't it grand to belong to a teachers union.
Brit Hume stated that it was about half supporting, half against the teacher. Sounds like dims support, and Repubs against.
LLS
My wife is a high school spanish teacher and she has to eat lunch in her room because she can't stand all the "Bush bashing" at the teachers lunch table. She even told me one of the history teachers showed his students a movie about how Bush rigged the election! And the worst part is SHE TEACHES IN A PRIVATE CATHOLIC SCHOOL so your kids arent safe anywhere...
You're so right. If something is wrong with public schools, parents will ALWAYS defend the school their children attend. Must be some sort of defense mechanism, and I seem to set it off whenever I mention that we homeschool.
"What does it take to fire a teacher?"
I can summon the whole statute in three words:
Death or retirment.
I guess it is easier to pass a background check as a pedophile going into the school as opposed to be fired for "ACT UP" type pedophile activities or flirting while working there.
”The entire US K - 12 and higher education system has been systematically overun by a liberal agenda. A big part of this is because we have unions controlling the education system.”
####
The reason it follows a liberal agenda is because it is a socialist institution. It’s no different from any other income redistribution agency. Government schools, government housing, government healthcare, government food handouts, (food stamps) etc., are all socialist schemes.
In the case of socialist schools, the vast majority of people feeding at the public trough don’t even consider themselves welfare recipients. They have the same entitlement mentality as the people on the other income redistribution programs, but don’t think they are in the same boat. It also differs because the people in the socialist school system aren’t just the underclass.
It also differs because the people being subsidized in other socialist programs don’t expect them to be efficient or responsive any more than they expect the DMV or the county tax office to be efficient and responsive.
The solution to the problem is to let the free market work. Eliminate the socialized school system and return to a capitalist system. Then, if you want your kids taught by a teacher who has a liberal agenda, you send them to a school with liberal teachers and management. If you want your kids taught by conservatives, you send them to a school with conservative teachers and management.
As long as one is willing to turn his children over to a socialist system, he has to expect the bureaucrats to advance socialism. The bureaucrats in the classroom and the administration have a vested interest in promoting socialism. They are employed in a socialist system.
This guy obviously has his head up his ass, bet air America gives him a radio spot.
I think the only way to solve this is for the people of Colorado to stand up and pass a law stating that teachers have to teach the subject the taxpayers are paying them to teach.
Just how long would this guy keep teaching if he didn't have a captive audience to preach his garbage to? Without an outlet for his hate he would soon move on.
If you listen to the tape....you start asking yourself some stupid questions. The whole speech is geared toward freshmen or better college kids...not 10th graders. Only a couple of minor bits of the speech had anything to do with geography...the rest was all poltical chit-chat. The whole speech was geared to be "fact", which is what a typical 16 year old might think if he heard this. If I had been in the class or my son...we probably would have fallen asleep 10 minutes into the class. Finally....if there were a test somewhere in the midst of this...how would you study for it? Most of the whole thing was junk he tossed out...you'd have to take notes or record the whole speech.
Frankly...its been years since I was in school and if this is normal...then the kids aren't learning nothing.
Combine that with the proven amplification capacity of our online media and we are growing some answerback capacity the NEA should be terrified by...
Either that or he will be hired to teach at Yale University.
This has been SOP in the public schools forever, and it is so in Texas where the unions work through the educational establishment. What you don't understand it that this is what managements wants. The average principal knows diddly about what is happening in an individual classroom. This guy seems to have had good discipline in his classes; that is 80% of what the principal wants. Another 10% is showing up and getting the paperwork in on time and the last 10% in getting along with other teachers and staff. Understood, however, is the Los Vegas rule: Don't let the public know what is going on.
Fire him? Sheesh, the administration will pay him extra to go on the lecture circuit.
There's a whole floor of them in an NYC school administration building. Get a cell phone and you can run your own business on the side. Not a bad deal.
Reminds me of a high school history teacher I had with a thick Bostonian accent that continually bashed Reagan every chance he had. This was in the mid nineties, but I'm sure he is still teaching.
Rob, from some of the interviews some of his former students have had, he apparently bragged about some of his sexual exploits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.