Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX Poll: Most Oppose Port Deal; Republicans Lose Ground
Fox News Website ^ | 3/02/2006 | Dana Blanton

Posted on 03/02/2006 3:01:32 PM PST by Dave S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560561-568 last
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
RE: Do not Dub said: "Finally, what evidence is there that this administration is planning to attack Iran, or that this deal is some sort of quid pro quo based upon such a potential scenario?"

The plans if any are probably secret.

Look at the Map of the Strait of Hormuz, a blind man could make the connection.

The focus is on fighting terror overseas, and keeping us safe at home with extra vigilence at the ports. No, attacks for almost 4 years on the United States, and I think I know why.

And if our security at the ports can be compromised by the owners of the container handlers, then we are already screwed.

561 posted on 03/03/2006 11:45:27 PM PST by agincourt1415 (Democrats on Auto Pilot, Leave them alone, let them fly into Brokeback Mountain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: agincourt1415
First of all, we already have basing rights in the UAE, so why would we need to bribe these Janus-faced, double-dealing sheiks anyway?

They are utterly dependent upon United States military resources for the survival of their monarchy.

If they weren't, then their country would have been a province of the IRI, or Saudi Arabia, or Saddam Hussein's Iraq, years ago.

Secondly, I highly doubt that this is part of some super-duper, top-secret plan to neutralize the threat posed by an Iran armed with WMDs.

Putting aside for a moment the fact that President Bush wasn't even aware of this until it was approved-which puts to rest the notion that there is some sub rosa plan involving Iran that we haven't been apprised of-eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat now would involve a sustained air campaign against not only the Bushehr nuclear reactor provided by our lovely Russian friends, along with the clandestine plants in Natanz and Arak Iran was forced to reveal because of photos smuggled out of the country by the National Council of Iranian Resistance, but also taking out numerous offensive and defensive sites.

Under the optimal scenario-where all of its nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities, missile launchers, and power plants were eliminated with minimal casualties to our side-a hostile Iranian theocracy would still exist, right next to its neighbor the UAE.

Why would the UAE take such a risk, if it knew in advance that they would still have to deal with the current Iranian government?

562 posted on 03/04/2006 12:21:47 AM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
"So, back to the topic at hand -- other than they are muslims, what evidence do you have against this company?"

Gee, Counselor Tolerance -- are you referring to that other than the worldwide "evidence" that wherever Muslims dwell there is eventually blood, murder, and mayhem at hand?

If you don't mind, I'd rather non-Muslims have NOTHING to do with American seaports, airports, and ammunition factories.

563 posted on 03/04/2006 5:41:37 AM PST by F16Fighter (Does everything we've "learned about Islam from 9/11" change with the UAE Port deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr; F16Fighter
CORRECTION:

"If you don't mind, I'd rather non-Muslims have NOTHING to do with American seaports, airports, and ammunition factories."

564 posted on 03/04/2006 5:45:44 AM PST by F16Fighter (Does everything we've "learned about Islam from 9/11" change with the UAE Port deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
If you don't mind, I'd rather Muslims have NOTHING to do with American seaports, airports, and ammunition factories.

I do mind, actually. And apparently so do the people in charge.

But I understand your feelings, even if I don't share them.

565 posted on 03/05/2006 8:51:57 AM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

That good, huh?


566 posted on 03/09/2006 11:18:55 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican

LV is fantastic - its the best move I ever made. NYC is a dump!


567 posted on 03/09/2006 11:41:07 AM PST by HitmanLV (Listen to my demos for Savage Nation contest: http://www.geocities.com/mr_vinnie_vegas/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Do you agree that the ladies there are the better than just about anywhere? Unreal IMO


568 posted on 03/09/2006 11:46:26 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560561-568 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson