Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...
Posted on 03/01/2006 7:03:01 PM PST by KSApplePie_two
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...
I will be praying for them. What a thing to have to face.
My FIL has a ventilator at home, that he uses when he sleeps. He has another type of oxygen tank that he uses periodically when he's awake. The one he uses when he's sleeping actually forces his lungs to function. When he uses the other tank, he has to be breathing on his own.
There's something missing from this story then. It doesn't make sense. Unless it's an insurance issue. Which would be horrible. I just can't see how the hospital can be the final decision maker in something like this. Hey...we got through an interaction without fighting, yay!!!!
I wonder how long we can keep it up.
I also wonder if the hospital believes (rightly or wrongly) that he's literally dead, and his family believes (rightly or wrongly) that he's alive. I don't see how his organs could function if he's dead. Maybe the hospital has a different definition of death than the rest of us have. Maybe they believe that if certain area(s) of the brain aren't functioning, even though other area(s) are functioning, the patient is dead. If, in their opinion, he's dead, they would consider it abusive to keep his body functioning.
And they hospital probably want to harvest his organs too, since apparently they're in good shape. This kid drowned in the bathtub? There's alot of guilt going on in this family too, I would imagine. Just a very sad story.
The organs might be a motivating factor, but it's hard to say at this point. I'm guessing that the hospital has a eugenics view of life and death, and they firmly believe anyone as severely brain damaged as this is actually dead, or better off dead.
i dont understand why a hospital wants to take
a patient off a ventilator but wont allow that
patient to go home to be cared for by family.
###
You can bet they want his organs for transplant.
"But we're going to do everything in our power to kill your kid anyway. Then we will continue to be sympathetic."
Some days I just want to slap the crap out of people...
L
Well, it's only been three weeks. The article states that the family has in home health care set up, and it is certainly possible to care for someone on a ventilator at home. He would just have to come home by ambulance.
I say give the baby some time befor removing the ventilator. Imo, three weeks is too soon.
This is something that I didn't think about. Well now I'm thinking about whose life is worth more? Yes, if organs are available, it is a blessing to give someone a chance at life. However, how do you choose whose life is worth more in a situation like this?
Brett's parents need real counseling at this point. The courts should keep their noses out of it. Brett should be given a chance to regain his ability to breathe on his own. His parents should realize that it possibly won't happen. This is where solid emotional support and counseling comes in. The courts should not be involved, and I don't know why they are, unless the hospital wants to harvest the child's organs, and the parents won't allow it.
It is not permitted to take the organs without the family's consent. A desire to collect the organs cannot be a motive for the hospital - it's pretty obvious there's no way this familly is giving permission.
Mrs VS
I've assumed that it is not permitted to take organs without the family's consent. That was then, and this is now. The courts are involved. Families no longer have rights under the current system.
You can't take organs without the family's consent. This hasn't changed.
If the baby has a strong heart, did you think about harvesting. Baby hearts are hard to come by.
The only thing to do is to check out the hospital and see what kind of organ harvesting program or system they have set up - do they link to a larger network? I think the hospital's after the little boy's heart.
Have you read about corpses being violated in mortuaries? The thieves are after bones. Do a search here, articles have been posted. Patients have gotten deathly ill from these products.
Not only is this illegal, and of course disgusting, it is also very lucrative. Now can you imagine the amount of money that relatively perfect organs can fetch?
Now, my concern is why the hospital took the parents to court to force disconnection of the ventilator, AND the feeding tubes, IV's. If the parents have a plan in place, why should the hospital care whether the patient is moved from their facility???? This is why some have mentioned organ harvesting. Can you come up with another reason why a medical facility would go to court to force a 2 yr old to die?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.