To: generally
Bingo!! I know of no freepers who advocate killing anyone, for goodness sake. While I do not approve of using children to promote a political agenda, most posts that I read, stated that the policy should be one parent per child, and no political shirts or signs. That, after all, is not the purpose of the Easter Egg Hunt. It is for children, and nothing else.
61 posted on
03/01/2006 12:22:16 PM PST by
gidget7
(Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
To: gidget7
How about a policy of "no uninvited guests"?
65 posted on
03/01/2006 12:24:16 PM PST by
weegee
(Liberals have a god complex. They always want to create and run Eden, err.... Utopia.)
To: gidget7
129 posted on
03/01/2006 1:03:46 PM PST by
uglybiker
(Don't blame me. I didn't make you stupid.)
To: gidget7
"One parent per child" does not work with *more than two child* homes. At the risk of sounding like a whiner, it is not fair to those and actually would work against traditional families. I'm guessing that these homosexual families don't have three or more kids. Limiting it to their own is fine but not to number.
Aside from that, I've been to and seen Easter Egg hunts and couldn't be bothered. The kids are blood thirsty and a lot go away with really hurt feelings because of the bullies. I can't imagine an event with that many people.
372 posted on
03/02/2006 1:46:50 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson