Translation..
Cannot refute the evidence so I'd better launch an Ad Hominem attack..
Right out of the homonazi playbook. LMAO!
I've actually stayed on point...you on the other hand have to resort to broken record homosexual agenda talking points which you can't support. I'm not excusing any heterosexuals for committing child sexual abuse, you on the other hand are excusing and ignoring the hard facts that prove your friends who practice perversion are more likely to offend children sexually than those without parphilic disorder.
You don't like my username? WOW, I guess that outs you as a Bill Clinton fan...why am I not surprised?
And then what does my religion have to with this debate? I make it a point not use any religious arguments. I've only cited these things they call math and science in my arguments. You on the other hand are mentally unarmed and simply ignore those pesky little things called facts.
And exactly how am I a bigot or a racist again? You think the practice of perversion is somehow an innate characteristic? LOL
In your zeal to defend the honor of your friends who practice perversion it would help if you actually had something of substance to use to defend them. Usually when your kind has to resort to being the grammer nanny the argument is already over.