Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Weighs Texas Political Map (Watch Kennedy on this)
The AP via Yahoo! News ^ | March 1, 2006 | Gina Holland

Posted on 03/01/2006 11:56:40 AM PST by new yorker 77

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/01/2006 11:56:43 AM PST by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans

TALK ABOUT BIAS!

Look at this lead sentence:

Texas Republicans were guilty of a naked political power grab when they re-drew congressional boundaries, the Supreme Court was told Wednesday in a case that could have a major impact on elections.

The Supreme Court will determine if they were guilty of anything, not those making the charge. Sounds like the media has already convicted them (us).

Gotta love how the media will find someone else to say all of the things that they know they can't say themselves. Since they buried the attribute, I take this to be the journalist's own perspective first and foremost.

2 posted on 03/01/2006 12:00:48 PM PST by weegee (Liberals have a god complex. They always want to create and run Eden, err.... Utopia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Republican congressman Michael Burgess of Texas said overturning the map would have little effect because Texas remains a Republican state.

My recollection (admittedly not perfect) is that something like 57% of the votes cast for House candidates in 2000 was for Republicans in Texas. With the "illegal" (as claimed by Demonrats) districts, now something like 57% of the Texas House delegation is Republican. Sounds evil to me - not!

3 posted on 03/01/2006 12:01:17 PM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Texas Republicans were guilty of a naked political power grab when they re-drew congressional boundaries

And the Democrats showed their true leadership style when they all took off to Oklahoma when they realized they did not have the votes to prevent the new map.

4 posted on 03/01/2006 12:03:30 PM PST by pikachu (Be alert --we need more lerts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Chris Bell (D) is among the disenfranchised. He lost his seat to a black Democrat. Rather than complain about districts based on race, he blames the opposition party.

He's running for governor now. Let's see him become a 3 time loser (mayor, congress, governor).


5 posted on 03/01/2006 12:03:35 PM PST by weegee (Liberals have a god complex. They always want to create and run Eden, err.... Utopia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
My recollection (admittedly not perfect) is that something like 57% of the votes cast for House candidates in 2000 was for Republicans in Texas. With the "illegal" (as claimed by Demonrats) districts, now something like 57% of the Texas House delegation is Republican. Sounds evil to me - not!

Prior to the redistricting, while Republicans received a majority of votes, they held only 11 seats to Democrats 21. Afterwards, as I recall, the Republicans held 17 to the Dems 15.

6 posted on 03/01/2006 12:05:55 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I dont remember the Democrats crying when Glendenning of Maryland threw the shaft into Connie Morella, and she was a RINO herself.


7 posted on 03/01/2006 12:11:24 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Here in Georgia- Democrats drew a horribly biased election map that basically disenfranchised Republicans. More Republicans were crammed into unbelievable districts-water down voting impact. Of course, it didn't work in the long run-desperate attempt from Dems to retain power in Georgia.


8 posted on 03/01/2006 12:16:37 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lepton

The fact is that the Dems don't like the idea of their 1990 Gerrymandering being reversed. IOW, these are the kind of people who hit a home run in the top of the inning, then declare the game over and insist that they won.


9 posted on 03/01/2006 12:16:47 PM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The lesson from all this is simple: As a strategy for every decade, stall and stall and stall the redistricting legislation until time runs out because of upcoming House elections, and then complain to the courts that you can't agree on redistricting. Get the courts to impose (or freeze) districts on the people in the name of election continuity, and then argue that new districts have been established and that it's now unconstitutional for the legislature to do what it couldn't do before the elections.

-PJ

10 posted on 03/01/2006 12:17:49 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Bob Barr was left without a district in Georgia...retaliabtion for impeachment of Clinton. Those in power have always drawn partisan election maps. Whiny Democrats can't win elections so they must rely on courts.


11 posted on 03/01/2006 12:18:15 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

If these crybabies are so unhappy then they should work to elect a Demo controlled legislature in 2010 and redraw the maps then.

Naked political power grab?? What biased "reporting." Like the Dems don't do that in every state they control?! Have you seen the way some districts are drawn to favor Dems and create "minority districts?" Some of the shapes are ridiculous and clearly drawn to pick and choose voters.


12 posted on 03/01/2006 12:29:20 PM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Btw, if the SC should rule the wrong way, and throw out this set of districts, how does that affect this year's election? I would think there might not be time to re-draw them for 2006. If the districts remain in place then that is good news but if they have to revert to the old map then that alone could cost the GOP a large portion of its already slim House majority.


13 posted on 03/01/2006 12:31:23 PM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Republicans now have 21 of the 32 seats in Congress (about 66%). Before is was 15 out of 32. With 57% voting Republican, Texas could have easily lined up 27 to 30 Republican seats in Congress. They bent over backwards not to affect any minority districts and to assure the same or improved minority representation in Congress. The only Democrats who lost their seats were old white men, like Martin Frost here in Dallas.


14 posted on 03/01/2006 12:34:03 PM PST by DJtex (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
The old map was also a court-imposed map because of Democrat stalling in 2000. It was essentially the 1990 map.

-PJ

15 posted on 03/01/2006 12:34:37 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Chris Bell was on C-SPAN this morning.

When the Republicans engage in gerrymandering, it's a naked political power grab. When the Democrats do it, it's a suitably-attired political power grab.

Gerrymandering is named after Elbridge Gerry, a Democrat.

16 posted on 03/01/2006 12:50:48 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

68% of congressmen from Texas (21 out of 32) are Republican.


17 posted on 03/01/2006 12:55:42 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DJtex

Thanks for the corrections.


18 posted on 03/01/2006 1:11:08 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Surely the only way to deal with this issue is to encourage the States to apply a nationally uniform formula which rigidly defines the calculations for electoral boundaries to minimise manipulation, ie encouraging the constituencies to be as circular as possible around a population area to make it harder to do infamous 'one block wide, three miles long' bpoundaries. As long as it was applied nationally it affects both parties equally and keeps your reps from getting too complacent.


19 posted on 03/01/2006 1:37:46 PM PST by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Androcles

The real question here is this....who cares? All of the elected folks that go up to Washington forget why they were elected and then they screw up the works for the rest of us poor working stiffs. Demorats and Repubs do it, and I just don't care anymore.


20 posted on 03/01/2006 1:56:50 PM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson