Proof for that accusation. Considering how every single "Fact" cited by the Port Deal foes, most recently yesterday's fraudulent misquoting of a Coast Guard Report to claim the exact OPPOSITE of what in fact says, anything stated by the Port Deal Critics is assumed to be a lie until independently verified. So far every attack line has been prove a lie. We are NOT "turning control of our ports over to the Arabs". We are NOT "giving the Arabs control of our Port Security functions" The Coast Guard did NOT oppose the Port deal. etc etc etc. So I suspect this too is just another lie made because the Port Deal Critics are too arrogant to admit they fell hook line and sinker for a Chucky Schumer Democrat Senate Election year PR stunt. They just keep flailing away hoping the NEXT attack lie will get them off the hook they decided in their hysteric ignorance to impale themselves on.
Sorry. That overstatement is unworthy of a conservative.
Because if you continue to maintain that hyperbole, it is you, who needs a reality check. The transparent desperation in your shrillness, to salvage the political wreckage of a pathetically bad mistake can't cover for the mistakes. Or the coverups.
Not a single point of the original objections have been "disproven." The democrats don't enter into this. This is between conservatives, and this administration, which is squarely in our sights.
Even Rush Limbaugh was very careful to draw a righteous distinction that the original...and continuing... opponents such as Peter King and Frank Gaffney are not wrong and are not liars.
And neither have any of the explicit Coast Guard concerns been "addressed." Note how ambiguous and nonspecific the "assurances" are...when the objections were quite specific.
Manifestly, a political decision was made to just accept the risks. Hence, the concerns were resolved with mere "assurances" rather than real procedures. Form over substance.
They were papered over, and Politically Correct Brass Hats saluted, and did as they were told.
And clearly, so has Rush, because, after all, we mustn't offend the UAE...and lose the Navy bases.
[Really "solid ally" there! ]
My Position: There has to be some other 'plum' we can give the UAE to keep them happy.