To: doodlelady; Amerigomag
The crux of the thread is that there is "confusion" in applying tax laws. The only reason there is confusion, is because all of the legislations that
should have been vetoed was
not vetoed and instead . Yes, he vetoed one Gay Marriage bill--but other significant legislation has been allowed to pass. Those laws will be used by the GLBTers as a legal basis for challenging the IRS position.
We are losing the chess game. All you need to do is look ahead a few moves. But you and all the other pro-GLBT freepers already know that, don't you?
To: calcowgirl
but other significant legislation has been allowed to passBut other significant legislation was signed into law by the Austrian with great fanfare and this legislation will be used by the homosexual community to challenge common sense and federal regulation.
To: calcowgirl
You are very sick if you think I am pro GLBT.
Very sick and desperate to make this debate personal.
Arnold vetoed the gay marriage bill, the one that counts.
Gays have no IRS validation without it.
16 posted on
02/28/2006 2:04:54 PM PST by
b9
("The real betrayal is in not being pragmatic" ~ Finny)
To: calcowgirl
But you and all the other pro..."Thanks for showing your new disgusting tactic. Tom let you down, so into the gutter you go.
Typical.
17 posted on
02/28/2006 2:08:40 PM PST by
PRND21
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson