Even if they weighted it better, Bush would still be under 40%.
I think the weight thing the amount of BS they had to pile up to make it work the way they wanted.
but what would happen if they use the 2004 voting breakdown, ahhh the truth is out there but do we want to know it
Exactly! I don't understand how much our fellow FReepers really think that oversampling Dems (by this much) Bush's numbers- it's NOT significant. If you had a mix of 34%R, 34%D, 32%I, then Bush's figures only go up slightly, to 36.82%, which is still pathetic.
Even Rasmussen has Bush at 43.0% 2 days in a row
Polled during a period of FACT-FREE HYSTERIA on more than one issue. AS USUAL, when the facts come out, things begin to change. How many times have we seen this??
Got Memo? Got 22 Indictments?
This is how this works. LIBS MUST LIE, EVEN TO THEMSELVES NOW....
Then they pay for heavily biased polling to SUPPORT the lies, build massive conspiracies around the lies,
and then can't ever figure out what happened when it all comes crashing down around them...
This is becoming sad to watch. I almost pity them, as they march the Democratic Party to it's eventual destruction......