[Mamzelle]

What you have are stories based on pretty interesting evidence. Ultimately, they are just stories--evolutionists, cosmologists, archeologists--spinners of plausible tales. Not science.

They have no control mechanisms, no double-blinds, no reproducibility. They serve no practical purpose except entertainment. What they also serve on your evo threads is a simple anti-religious agenda for the OC-pathology set.

Whenever a real threat to free enquiry and science comes along, the evos show little interest.

[Junior]

What you have are stories based on pretty interesting evidence.

We have theories based on a CONVERGENCE of evidence from DOZENS of disciplines. You may not accept that, but it's true, no matter how you rail against it.

They have no control mechanisms, no double-blinds, no reproducibility.

Bull puckey. You obviously didn't understand when I pointed out that ice cores, varves and tree rings are used to calibrate other dating methods (and those calibrated dating methods are used to calibrate even deeper dating methods). Like I said, you can rail against reality, but it doesn't make you even remotely right.

So, next you'll start in on your conspiracy theories...