Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro; CarolinaGuitarman; PatrickHenry
Silly Buttars! It wasn't his great-grandfather, it was his great-grandfather's great-grandfather's great-grandfather that was the ape.

You guys need to get your stories straight.

61 posted on 02/28/2006 6:39:46 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe
Taxonomically, we are still apes, yes.

You can catch me on that. Sometimes I use "ape" in the creationist sense of anything with too much hair and too small a vocabulary. Some baseball catchers like Andy Etchebarren or Thurman Munson might have qualified--I'm not sure. There's "ape" as in "anything that makes a creationist say his great-grandfather wasn't one," and there's the the group of tailless primates that split from monkeys thirty-something million years ago. We aren't in the one group and we are in the other.

72 posted on 02/28/2006 6:49:12 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

You need to start answering our questions, instead of obfuscating.


74 posted on 02/28/2006 6:53:23 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson