Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse; pby
Please show us the physiographical evidence to support the idea that springs burst forth, contributing to a global flood that exceeded 29,000 feet in depth above MSL

You are assuming that at that time Mount Everest was 29,00 feet above mean sea level. The fact is that it was below sea level at that time. Everything was.

574 posted on 02/28/2006 5:20:11 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

"You are assuming that at that time Mount Everest was 29,00 feet above mean sea level. The fact is that it was below sea level at that time. Everything was."

Oh, please DO enlighten us as to how that much of a shift in physiographic forms came about only 5-6k years ago.


576 posted on 02/28/2006 5:22:34 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
You seem to be serious about the global flood.

How can you explain a continuous archaeological record in the western US for up to 13,400 years? Continuous=no evidence of a flood with everything washed away and replaced from Eurasia?

How about a mtDNA record that is close to as long, and shows no break/population replacement at 4,000-5,000 years ago where the flood is supposed to have occurred?

And the critters make that record look shabby. They have tens or hundreds of thousands of years in the New World with no evidence of a global flood.

601 posted on 02/28/2006 5:37:55 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson