[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

That would be Mark et al/ Christian Witnesses, world court of public opinion, year 0 to year 2000.

In other words, you did not have an actual court citation, and simply decided to engage in another round of frequently-repeated erroring.

[zeeba neighba]

Absolutely incorrect. The people of the world were the jury and the jury voted, and are still voting. Believe it or not, they still can.

[blue-duncan]

"In other words, you did not have an actual court citation, and simply decided to engage in another round of frequently-repeated erroring"

Acts 26:26 (KJV) "For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner."

This is an actual court room hearing and the judge has been cited as a witness to the truth of the suffering and resurrection of Christ. It was written by a physician/historian, not a disciple, from interviews and records to a third party who was not a disciple. The judge does not deny the facts just the implications drawn from them.