Replies

"But none of these changes indicate a complete cross species leap or evolution."

Actually, they do, thank you very much. You may not like the scientific definition of "species," but that is the one used, not your own preference.

"Time should NOT be the errant element of proving a chemical DNA process of evolution."

If I understand this vaguely-worded objection correctly, you are saying that evolutionary events involving billions of gene pairs should occur instantaneously.

Pardon me while I laugh myself silly...there, I'm done.

"If evolution is indeed a innate scientific process, it's formula should be definable and demonstrable in everyday experiments."

You are, once again, frequently-repeated erroring.

Gobbledegook.

A process as "important" to the foundation of life as Evos believe Evolution to be should not only be easily demonstrated in a third grade class room by its chemical formula as it works upon DNA, but should be reducible to a simple formula.

Sorry, but since Evos push how pervasive and important EvoThink to be, then, like the simplicity of water, Evolution should be easily observable, demonstrable, and reducible to easily understood formula

But it's complexity and unobservability and dependence upon time for its creative processes to work (time by itself is not a creative process in nature)) belie its lie.

it is up to Evos to make the genius of EvoThink very very plain, because Evos believe Evolution to be one of the building blocks of life.

The best I've done on FR so far is to get one Evo to admit it is a chemical DNA process.

That's a start. But some Evo needs to step up to the plate and really PROVE their contentions with mathematical formula. The lack of one, the "vast complexity" of what should be an easily observable force of nature, causes this old time Aristotelean thinker to not laugh at Evos (as the derisive comments against me from Evos here on FR betray EvoThink's irrational and religious basis) but to feel very very sorry that they have been so deceived by their vaulted view of man's knowledge and anti God bias.