Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utah House kills evolution bill
Fort Wayne Journal Gazette ^ | 28 February 2006 | JENNIFER DOBNER

Posted on 02/28/2006 4:05:45 AM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,541 next last
To: WildHorseCrash

What if the Bible said something that your experience told you was loony.

Like a 40 days rain flooding the entire world?

501 posted on 02/28/2006 3:10:52 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: pby
The Greek text says 'ana meson ton orion dekapoleos'. Ana meson translates as through the middle of; orion can be 'boundaries' , similarly to Latin fines. Clearly this means through the boundaries of the Decapolis. The Vulgate is a word-for-word translation of the Greek. The point is, they went through he territory of the Decapolis to get to the Sea of Galilee, which is geographically ridiculous if you're coming from Tyre and Sidon. And since you mention Matthew 15, that also states they ended up by the Sea of Galilee, though it doesn't mention the Decapolis (the author of Matthew was likely a Jewish Christian who knew Palestine, so he probably decided to leave out the bit about the Decapolis).

One thing is certain, no matter how you translate "orion", you can't prove that Mark's statement is inaccurate geographically.

I can prove it's like going from D.C. to New York via Boston.

The logical conclusion is that the author of Mark was working from (at best) someone else's account, and got this bit wrong.

502 posted on 02/28/2006 3:14:29 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
No need to get testy, just because you threw out a statement and now have to google around to back it up. My Latin is rusty, but that's because I never use it and don't keep up with the vocabulary. Even if it was, I wouldn't spend any time in the Vulgate anyway. I also don't use the NIV bible.

If you are a world class biblical scholar, my apologies. I guess you are some sort of wunderkind, just a man of many accomplishments.

503 posted on 02/28/2006 3:16:04 PM PST by zeeba neighba (What I'm reading now: The Word of the Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Festival of Tractionless Bloviating Disruptor Trolls placemarker


504 posted on 02/28/2006 3:19:30 PM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

What longshadow said.


505 posted on 02/28/2006 3:20:27 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba

One doesn't have to be a world-class biblical scholar to be familiar with the basics of modern scholarship about the origin of the books of the Bible. I recommend www.earlychristianwritings.com. And I had a very old-fashioned education, and so learned Latin and Greek in school.


506 posted on 02/28/2006 3:20:46 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: WildHorseCrash
How many times in life has your experience been different from someone else's...even in similar situations?

How many times has one of your experienced-based conclusions been inaccurate, falsified and/or wrong?

Given the differences in everyone's experience, and also given the fallibility of personnel experience, can one find absolute truth in experience?

As to the all cats lay eggs question...There is no basis of reality in the question and the Bible never contradicts truth (It is Truth).

507 posted on 02/28/2006 3:21:16 PM PST by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
"Virtual ignore is a time-saver" placemarker.
508 posted on 02/28/2006 3:24:30 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.; Coyoteman
Just for the halibut I google a bit myself. I'll let you know what comes down the pike. It cod be interesting.

OK now that is funny! I think you guys have too much time on your brain. LOL!!

509 posted on 02/28/2006 3:24:34 PM PST by phantomworker (It doesn’t matter what other people think or feel or say. “You are the only person who defines you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: ml1954
Read the passage about the flood...it wasn't just the rain; "all the springs of the deep burst forth..."
510 posted on 02/28/2006 3:25:44 PM PST by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

scold, school marm , send in the clowns, placemarker


511 posted on 02/28/2006 3:25:58 PM PST by zeeba neighba (What I'm reading now: The Word of the Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Cosmic ray reference?

Ana meson from Orion?


512 posted on 02/28/2006 3:26:00 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Virginia-American
I don't get this. Does cladistics dispute the "hair, mammaries, three-ear-bone" characterization of mammals?

Those characters distinguish a clade within reptiles. As you note mammals branched off after some, but before most, major reptile groups. So, on the cladistic approach, "mammals" can't be a group with equal rank to "reptiles". Although this is the way we classify them. If we were consistently cladistic "mammals" would have to be a subgroup of "reptiles".

513 posted on 02/28/2006 3:29:15 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor; zeeba neighba
Or a boilerplate set of "Apparent Contradictions Handy for Arguments with the Religious." Probably available on Juniors Infinite Collection of Unavoidable Spam.

You'd have more fun with the death of Judas.

514 posted on 02/28/2006 3:30:05 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: pby

Read the passage about the flood...it wasn't just the rain; "all the springs of the deep burst forth..."

That sounds even loonier to me.

515 posted on 02/28/2006 3:31:29 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor

Yeah, aint the InterNet great?


516 posted on 02/28/2006 3:32:39 PM PST by zeeba neighba (What I'm reading now: The Professor and the Big Bologny Sandwich: read the book to see who chokes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: zeeba neighba
New thread of interest.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1587326/posts

517 posted on 02/28/2006 3:33:25 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Merci, Mamzelle.


518 posted on 02/28/2006 3:33:59 PM PST by zeeba neighba (What I'm reading now: The Professor and the Big Bologny Sandwich: read the book to see who chokes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Why are hominids not apes then? What is the demarcation criteria?

I believe the demarcation is upright stance and a striding gait.

Are we not primates too? Or mammals?

Lemurs (and some more "primitive" forms), monkeys, the "lower" apes, anthropoid apes and humans are all primates. So far as I know this is also a legitimate clade.

I think "mammals" would also be a legitimate clade, but NOT if given equal rank (as it is) to "reptiles". Reptiles are then not monophyletic (the group doesn't include ALL of its descendents) and this is not allowed in cladistics as I understand.

519 posted on 02/28/2006 3:36:01 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: ml1954

I wasn't rain. It was invisible pink unicorn tears.


520 posted on 02/28/2006 3:38:35 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,541 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson