Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam the Sham
Child, it means if the Dems nominate someone like Warner he WILL be the next president. The party of an unpopular president WILL lose the next election. Ask Truman and Nixon.

Tell me, has the U.S. and its population changed any in the last 30 or 40 or 50 years? These are not the same times and the not the same parties and the not the same population.
44 posted on 02/27/2006 5:27:06 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: adorno

That was a silly reponse. I was showing you that the party of an unpopular president has never kept the White House in the next election.

Gore was running on peace and prosperity. On paper he should have won. But the public was tired of Clinton drama so he lost.


68 posted on 02/27/2006 5:33:29 PM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson