Posted on 02/27/2006 1:08:30 PM PST by Coleus
Last week, former Secretary of State Alexander Haig suggested on national television that I should be "jailed for perjury" for criticizing U.S. government plans to permit a company controlled by the Chinese military to operate a strategic port facility in Long Beach, Calif.
Gen. Haig has always been something of an authoritarian control freak. No one conscious at the time President Reagan was shot will ever forget his chilling "I'm in control here" statement from the White House. But his offhand call to jail a journalist exercising his First Amendment rights raises other questions.
Haig is proudly listed in official publications of the Chinese Overseas Shipping Co., or COSCO, as a senior honorary adviser. One wonders what his compensation in that role might be and how it affects his judgment about the national security issues at stake in the question of whether COSCO should control the port facility in Long Beach. We may never know the answer to that question because Haig has failed to register as a foreign agent for China as required by law, and Attorney General Janet Reno, the controlling legal authority, appears to have no interest in pursuing such flagrant violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
But maybe Haig has become enamored of the Chinese system, under which raising such questions would be grounds for jailing a journalist. I didn't see one word about the continuing, brutal crackdown on the press in China during the U.S. press coverage of China's just-ended Communist Party Congress. But it is intensifying as official policy.
Among the many calls China's strongman Zemin Jiang made during the plenum was for even tighter restrictions on the media to stop the spread of "decadent ideas." Remember, this comes in a country that recently closed 300 already tightly controlled newspapers.
"We should tighten control over the press and publishing, optimizing their structures and improving their quality," Jiang said. He stressed the media should always be guided by the "party spirit" and strive to educate the people with the correct socialist ideology.
That's the role of the press in China -- to brainwash and indoctrinate people living in a closed, totalitarian society so they don't get any crazy ideas about freedom. Here's what Agence France-Presse reported on the speech: "Mr. Jiang has been at the forefront of a national campaign to bring rogue elements of the arts and media to heel, closing 'unhealthy' publications and warning the official press against straying from the party line.
"We must resist the corrosion of decadent ideas and cultures," Jiang said. In case you weren't sure, the word "decadent" today in China means "politically incorrect." Permitting more market-driven enterprises, even businesses tightly controlled by the party apparatchiks, does not extend to the realm of information in modern-day China. Even in this so-called "information age," this is a closed society -- a throwback to the most abusive and repressive dictatorships the world has ever known.
"We should, on the one hand, try to boost our cultural undertakings, and on the other tighten control over the markets for cultural products to facilitate their sound development," said Jiang. Is this the kind of system Haig prefers? If he feels more comfortable in such environs, I suggest he pack his bags today, take the next flight to Beijing and spend the rest of his days living under the rules he would like to impose on the rest of us.
Instead, Haig is the worst kind of hypocrite -- the kind who accepts every benefit of life in a free society while personally profiting from a promotional relationship with the cruelest, most repressive and increasingly dangerous nation of earth. To think that this man was once not much more than a heartbeat away from the presidency is scary. But then, again, it was President Clinton -- even more than Haig -- who engineered this COSCO plan in Long Beach.
It was just days after COSCO adviser Hongye Zheng attended one of Clinton's Saturday morning radio broadcasts, and following a transfer of $391,000 into the Democratic National Committee's coffers mysteriously raised by Johnny Chung, that Washington proposed the deal to Long Beach officials. Haig vociferously defended President Clinton's decision last week on C-SPAN. So, maybe he's living in the right country, after all. Perhaps it's freedom-loving Americans who should be in the market for a new one -- or, at least, a radical change in direction.
I'll read the whole COSCO thing, but on the Reagan shooting, I think that's a cheap shot. Haig Identified the VP's wherabouts and then said "I'm in control here at the White House." The statement was not chilling because Haig was declaring control, he was so nervous that he was practically shaking, and his demeanor conveyed anything but firm control.
Sent a chill up my spine. His poor choice of words exposed exactly what he was hoping for, " Hail to Chief Al."
Well he couldn't have been hoping for much, because upon Reagan's death VP Bush would be President. I think Haig was merely trying to say things were calm and under control at the White House. He failed miserably, because he was either shaking or close to it.
Bill's wife left him.
He didn't understand. After Chelsea was born, she told him they had to cut back on expenses. He had to give up drinking beer. He was not a big drinker, maybe a 12-pack on weekends. Anyway, he gave it up but he noticed the other day that when she came home from shopping there was a $45 dollar receipt for makeup.
Bill said, "Wait a minute! I've given up beer and you haven't given up anything!"
Hillary said, "I buy that makeup for you, so I can look pretty for you."
Bill told her, "Hell, that's what the beer was for!"
He doesn't think she'll be back
"authoritarian control freak."
Please don't damn dear old Al with faint praise.
He's a monster...But Clinton's far worse.
Well, if the guys on the board of this company, hes earning his daily bread all right. Who knows what the chinese are up to.
I think that's a cheap shot. Haig Identified the VP's wherabouts and then said "I'm in control here at the White House." >>
you're right, somebody had to be in charge and not let the world know that the govt. was w/o a leader.
Please tell me why no in Congress was upset about this deal when it occured, except for a couple of Repubican Congressmen ?
Fresh from her shower, Hillary stands in front of the mirror, complaining to Bill that her breasts are too small. Instead of his standard response of reassuring her that wasn't the case, Bill uncharacteristically comes up with a suggestion. "If you want your breasts to grow, then every day take a piece of toilet paper and rub it between your breasts for a few seconds."
Willing to try anything, Hillary fetches a piece of toilet paper, and stands in front of the mirror, rubbing it between her breasts. "How long will this take?" she asks.
"They'll grow larger over a period of years," he replies.
She stops. "Why do you think rubbing a piece of toilet paper between my breasts every day will make my breasts grow over the years?"
Bill responds with "Worked for your butt, didn't it?"
LOL
No one can make excuses for the Communist government bureacrats in China who go to great lengths to hold onto control of China. However, having had the opportunity to spend time there at different times over three years prior to 2001, I can testify to the good nature, intelligence and worth ethic of the average Chinese men and women.
They know (mainly from the internet) how the rest of the world is and they are working diligently to become more like us. They love their kids, just like we love ours and want a better life for them than they have had.
China will be a formidable force in the coming years and while they may not ultimately have a representative government like we have, they will throw off the Commie yolk.
Of course folks of all political persuasion do love their drama, and this was a good opportuntiy to vilify Al Haig. Who by the way, was an excellent sec of State and certainly knew the world around us.
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/poll?poll=140;results=1
Should a state-owned Arab company be allowed to manage six major United States seaports?
No 52.7% 2,189
Yes 33.3% 1,383
Undecided 14.0% 582
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.