To: CWOJackson
He started right out claiming their was a massive effort of hysterical campaigning...in support of the deal. While he continues to insist that it's about controlling "ports", not "facilities".
I would actually like to hear Hannity on Rush's show or Rush on Hannity's show. These two are POLAR opposites on this issue.
66 posted on
02/27/2006 12:26:39 PM PST by
Eagle of Liberty
(The Democrat Party is engulfed in a Culture of Hypocrisy)
To: Kerretarded
I can accept being on opposite sides of an issue but Sean Vannity is outright lying and he knows it. Whatever happened to his conservative principles?
To: Kerretarded
I would actually like to hear Hannity on Rush's show or Rush on Hannity's show. These two are POLAR opposites on this issue.That's a very good idea........... but that just goes to show how vapid and heartless, and balless, our conservative talkshow hosts can be on this.
Your idea is GREAT............ but it will never happen.......... because both of them are just weak-kneed self-serving children.
80 posted on
02/27/2006 12:32:39 PM PST by
beyond the sea
(Alan Simpson: "All you get is controversy, crap, and confusion from the media.")
To: Kerretarded
Peter King, that supporter of Gerry Adams and the IRA, blamed Rush for the change occuring......people who were against are now FOR.....and it's all Rush's fault! LOLOL....
Clearly Sean is on the side of the Port Authority of NY union folks.
That's his right but he's not being honest about those who do not support the unions against the UAE holding the lease on the terminals.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson